From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 10:52:39 +1000 Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 000/151] lustre: update to 2.11 support In-Reply-To: References: <1569869810-23848-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <87imp96jb8.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Message-ID: <877e5o6ka0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org On Tue, Oct 01 2019, James Simmons wrote: >> > This patchset covers 3 areas. The fix 6 patches resolves critical >> > bugs in the linux client. Mainly for handling of LNet with secondary >> > IP aliases as well as an RCU issue reported with debugging enabled. >> > This consoldation of IP handling makes any kernel API changes in the >> > future easier to handle. >> > >> > The last 9 patches cover patches in the lustre-testing that landed >> > to the OpenSFS branch. >> > >> > The rest of the patches cover all the patches missing from the >> > Lustre 2.11 release. I have done extentsive testing of these >> > patches (sanity, sanity-pfl, sanity-dom, sanity-pfl). Only >> > regression I saw was sanity-flr 200 which needs to be investiaged. >> > So we are in very good shape. >> >> Thanks a lot for these James! >> Though I only received up to 133/151 - are 18 missing, or was there a >> miscount?? > > Their should be 151 patches. I have had this problem of patches not making > it to my mailbox. That is why I have: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/lustre-devel/list > > All the patches are there. So they are. There is even a nice "series" line so I can grab them call. I wonder why they didn't get delivered to me ... I've applied them all to my tree with no further issues. I'll push something out later today. Thanks, NeilBrown -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: