From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Kashyap Chamarthy" <kchamart@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Amit Shah" <amit@kernel.org>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Richard W . M . Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom`
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 18:18:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877eayjn9v.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190510134203.24012-2-lvivier@redhat.com> (Laurent Vivier's message of "Fri, 10 May 2019 15:42:01 +0200")
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> writes:
> From: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
>
> When QEMU exposes a VirtIO-RNG device to the guest, that device needs a
> source of entropy, and that source needs to be "non-blocking", like
> `/dev/urandom`. However, currently QEMU defaults to the problematic
> `/dev/random`, which is "blocking" (as in, it waits until sufficient
> entropy is available).
>
> Why prefer `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random`?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> The man pages of urandom(4) and random(4) state:
>
> "The /dev/random device is a legacy interface which dates back to a
> time where the cryptographic primitives used in the implementation
> of /dev/urandom were not widely trusted. It will return random
> bytes only within the estimated number of bits of fresh noise in the
> entropy pool, blocking if necessary. /dev/random is suitable for
> applications that need high quality randomness, and can afford
> indeterminate delays."
>
> Further, the "Usage" section of the said man pages state:
>
> "The /dev/random interface is considered a legacy interface, and
> /dev/urandom is preferred and sufficient in all use cases, with the
> exception of applications which require randomness during early boot
> time; for these applications, getrandom(2) must be used instead,
> because it will block until the entropy pool is initialized.
>
> "If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all
> major Linux distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the
> output is cryptographically secure against attackers without local
> root access as soon as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and
> perfectly adequate for network encryption session keys. Since reads
> from /dev/random may block, users will usually want to open it in
> nonblocking mode (or perform a read with timeout), and provide some
> sort of user notification if the desired entropy is not immediately
> available."
>
> And refer to random(7) for a comparison of `/dev/random` and
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> - - -
>
> Given the above, change the entropy source for VirtIO-RNG device to
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> Related discussion in these[1][2] past threads.
>
> [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08335.html
> -- "RNG: Any reason QEMU doesn't default to `/dev/urandom`?"
> [2] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg02724.html
> -- "[RFC] Virtio RNG: Consider changing the default entropy source to
> /dev/urandom"
>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Suggest to work Daniel's analysis into the commit message, like this:
When QEMU exposes a VirtIO-RNG device to the guest, that device needs a
source of entropy, and that source needs to be "non-blocking", like
`/dev/urandom`. However, currently QEMU defaults to the problematic
`/dev/random`, which on Linux is "blocking" (as in, it waits until
sufficient entropy is available).
Why prefer `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random` on Linux?
------------------------------------------------------
[...]
What about other OSes?
----------------------
/dev/urandom exists and works on OS-X, FreeBSD, DragonFlyBSD, NetBSD
and OpenBSD, which covers all the non-Linux platforms we explicitly
support, aside from Windows.
On Windows /dev/random doesn't work either so we don't regress. This
is actually another argument in favour of using the newly proposed
rng-builtin backend by default, as that will work on Windows.
- - -
Given the above, change the entropy source for VirtIO-RNG device to
`/dev/urandom`.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-10 13:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] rng-builtin: add an RNG backend that uses qemu_guest_getrandom() Laurent Vivier
2019-05-10 13:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-10 16:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-10 16:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-10 16:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-10 16:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-10 16:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-10 17:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-10 16:18 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-05-10 13:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] rng-builtin: add an RNG backend that uses qemu_guest_getrandom() Laurent Vivier
2019-05-10 13:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] virtio-rng: change default backend to rng-builtin Laurent Vivier
2019-05-10 16:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-13 10:26 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-14 14:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-12 18:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] rng-builtin: add an RNG backend that uses qemu_guest_getrandom() Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-13 6:36 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-13 8:49 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-05-13 12:13 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877eayjn9v.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kchamart@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.