From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 10:09:56 +1100 Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/14] lustre: fixes for many test failures In-Reply-To: References: <1546810607-6348-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <87ftu5jbbm.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Message-ID: <877efgjc8r.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org On Mon, Jan 07 2019, James Simmons wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 06 2019, James Simmons wrote: >> >> > This patch series contains mostly fixes to resolve the majority of >> > the testing failures seen. Besides that are UAPI headers fixes to >> > prepare for when lustre will leave the staging tree. Include Neil's >> > dump_page_cache patch as well since it was landed in the OpenSFS >> > branch and the migration of lu_objects to rhashtables depended on >> > it. >> >> Thanks - I've applied these. >> I haven't received all of the PFL series yet ... 16,17,18 still in limbo >> - so I haven't applied those yet. >> When the stragglers here here, I suspect they'll all go in. > > Do you recieve patch 16,17,18 ? I do see they made it to the mailing list > archive : Yes, they arrived eventually, thanks. The whole series seemed to be coming in dribs and drabs ... some mail server somewhere must have been a bit sick. I'll have a look through them all today. Thanks, NeilBrown > > http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/2019-January/thread.html > > Also they are showing up at the patchwork site: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/lustre-devel/list > > which is much easier to work with as a patch. Lastly if you need I can > send you those patches directly to you again. Let me know what you want. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: