From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Implement PV IPI in linux guest
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:10:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877emhewdx.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530265876-18136-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> (Wanpeng Li's message of "Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:51:15 +0800")
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
>
> Implement PV IPIs in guest kernel.
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> index 0ede697..19980ec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT 7
> #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_TLB_FLUSH 9
> #define KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF_VMEXIT 10
> +#define KVM_FEATURE_PV_SEND_IPI 11
>
> #define KVM_HINTS_REALTIME 0
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index 5b2300b..b4f8dc3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -454,6 +454,57 @@ static void __init sev_map_percpu_data(void)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +
> +static void __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags, ipi_bitmap = 0;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> +
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
> + __set_bit(per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu), &ipi_bitmap);
We need a protection against per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu) > here.
> + kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_SEND_IPI, ipi_bitmap, vector);
> +
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + __send_ipi_mask(mask, vector);
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + unsigned int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + struct cpumask new_mask;
> + const struct cpumask *local_mask;
> +
> + cpumask_copy(&new_mask, mask);
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, &new_mask);
> + local_mask = &new_mask;
> + __send_ipi_mask(local_mask, vector);
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_send_ipi_allbutself(int vector)
> +{
> + kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself(cpu_online_mask, vector);
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_send_ipi_all(int vector)
> +{
> + __send_ipi_mask(cpu_online_mask, vector);
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_setup_pv_ipi(void)
> +{
> + apic->send_IPI_mask = kvm_send_ipi_mask;
> + apic->send_IPI_mask_allbutself = kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself;
> + apic->send_IPI_allbutself = kvm_send_ipi_allbutself;
> + apic->send_IPI_all = kvm_send_ipi_all;
> + printk("KVM setup pv IPIs\n");
> +}
> +
> static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> {
> native_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus);
> @@ -624,12 +675,24 @@ static uint32_t __init kvm_detect(void)
> return kvm_cpuid_base();
> }
>
> +static void __init kvm_apic_init(void)
> +{
> + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_SEND_IPI))
> + kvm_setup_pv_ipi();
> +}
> +
> +static void __init kvm_init_platform(void)
> +{
> + x86_platform.apic_post_init = kvm_apic_init;
> +}
> +
> const __initconst struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_kvm = {
> .name = "KVM",
> .detect = kvm_detect,
> .type = X86_HYPER_KVM,
> .init.guest_late_init = kvm_guest_init,
> .init.x2apic_available = kvm_para_available,
> + .init.init_platform = kvm_init_platform,
> };
>
> static __init int activate_jump_labels(void)
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 9:51 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Add PV IPIs support Wanpeng Li
2018-06-29 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Implement PV IPI in linux guest Wanpeng Li
2018-06-29 10:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2018-06-30 10:04 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-06-29 11:22 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-29 13:01 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-29 9:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: X86: Implement PV send IPI support Wanpeng Li
2018-06-29 10:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-06-29 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-30 10:05 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-06-29 10:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-30 10:04 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877emhewdx.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.