From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the pci tree
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:29:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f05v58m.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621115443.3e10f0bc@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:54:43 +1000")
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
>
> between commit:
>
> c336cc0ee4eb ("PCI: Split ->reset_notify() method into
> ->reset_prepare() and ->reset_done()")
>
> from the pci tree and commit:
>
> 68efd0386988 ("mwifiex: pcie: stop setting/clearing 'surprise_removed'")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Thanks, the fix looks good to me. I guess there's nothing I can do at
the moment and Linus needs to fix this when he pulls from Dave (or
Bjorn, whichever is the last)?
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 1:54 linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the pci tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-21 13:29 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2017-06-21 13:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03 1:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-23 2:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-04-03 3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2018-04-05 1:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-12 0:25 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-14 0:27 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-14 0:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-26 3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-26 3:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-12-10 1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2012-12-10 1:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-12-10 6:44 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877f05v58m.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.