From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:25:33 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: dt for v4.10 (#1) In-Reply-To: <20161119015838.GG2543@localhost> (Olof Johansson's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:58:38 -0800") References: <87poltbwt2.fsf@free-electrons.com> <20161119015838.GG2543@localhost> Message-ID: <877f7zanb6.fsf@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Olof, On sam., nov. 19 2016, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:50:33PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here is the first pull request for dt for mvebu for v4.10. >> >> I hope being able to send a second part very soon with the series >> removing all the DT warning. >> >> Gregory >> >> The following changes since commit 1001354ca34179f3db924eb66672442a173147dc: >> >> Linux 4.9-rc1 (2016-10-15 12:17:50 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.infradead.org/linux-mvebu.git tags/mvebu-dt-4.10-1 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to cf20c489de6fcef88405d4febef7a078d2053b9e: >> >> ARM: dt: orion5x: convert ls-chl to FDT (2016-11-07 17:23:34 +0100) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> mvebu fixes for 4.10 (part 1) >> >> Most of the commit are pinmux and i2c fix for netgear NASes >> Fix on a wrong comment about PLL frequency >> Bigger commit: conversion of on otion5x based board to the device tree >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Ashley Hughes (1): >> ARM: dt: orion5x: convert ls-chl to FDT > > This is a great conversion, but I'd like to see the code handled a > little differently. > > First of all, there's no longer a need to have a config option for > MACH_LINKSTATION_LSCHL, as long as ARCH_ORION5X_DT is enabled you'll > be fine. So you can remove that Kconfig entry alltogether. > > Also, there's no need to make the DT addition and the legacy platform > removal in one commit. It's common that we build up the DT support to the point > that it's at parity, and then remove the legacy board. That way we also don't > entangle DT commits with non-DT commits, which can sometimes be a bit of a pain > (in particular for those who maintain a copy of the DT subdir in another git > repo). > > So, mind respinning with this fixed? Thanks! OK I am doing it. Gregory > > > -Olof > -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com