Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Fix 10.4 extended peer stats update

["Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>]

Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mohammed@codeaurora.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:57:52PM +0000, Valo, Kalle wrote:
>> Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mohammed@codeaurora.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> > +void ath10k_sta_update_rx_duration(struct ath10k *ar,
>> >> > +				   struct ath10k_fw_stats *stats)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +	struct ath10k_fw_file *fw_file = &ar->normal_mode_fw.fw_file;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +	if (fw_file->wmi_op_version < ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_10_4)
>> >> > +		ath10k_sta_update_stats_rx_duration(ar, &stats->peers);
>> >> > +	else
>> >> > +		ath10k_sta_update_extd_stats_rx_duration(ar,
>> >> > +							 &stats->peers_extd);
>> >> > +}
>> >> 
>> >> _Ideally_ wmi_op_version should be used only in ath10k_wmi_attach() and
>> >> nowhere else. Isn't there any other way to detect this scenario? For
>> >> example, what if you store stats_id to struct ath10k_fw_stats and do
>> >> something like this:
>> >> 
>> >> if (stats->stats_id & WMI_10_4_STAT_PEER_EXTD)
>> >> 	ath10k_sta_update_extd_stats_rx_duration(ar,
>> >> 						 &stats->peers_extd);
>> >> else
>> >> 	ath10k_sta_update_stats_rx_duration(ar, &stats->peers);
>> >> 
>> >> Would that work?
>> >
>> > [shafi] I am also thinking to re-use (ar->fw_stats_req_mask & WMI_10_4_STAT_PEER_EXTD)
>> > it might work, but will it conflict vdev stats WMI_STAT_VDEV (though its not currently
>> > supported for 10.2 )
>> 
>> Can you describe more how they conflict?
>
> [shafi] 'WMI_STAT_VDEV' and 'WMI_10_4_STAT_PEER_EXTD' are having the same value
> BIT(3), though as of now we are only 'WMI_10_4_STAT_PEER_EXTD' for 10.4

Ah. But that's easy to solve, for example you could use a bool instead.

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k