From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasudev Kamath Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:46:03 +0530 Message-ID: <877fm8x2e4.fsf@copyninja.info> References: <6b0caf4dfe7d407988717a23fb855097@EX132MBOX1B.de2.local> <53832095.10901@xenomai.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Using Preempt RT with I-Pipe/Xenomai List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Vasudev Kamath writes: > After the patch Kernel did compile, though I've not tested the compiled > kernel yet. Since I've no idea if what I've done is correct or not I would > be happy to get some review on this patch from you or fellow Xenomai folks. > Err correction, it looks like there are still errors but compilation didn't stop on errors. Currently I saw following error. kernel/locking/rtmutex.c: In function _rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain_: kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:459:969: error: _spinlock_t_ has no member named _rlock_ kernel/locking/rtmutex.c: In function _rt_spin_lock_slowunlock_hirq_: kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1081:971: error: _spinlock_t_ has no member named _rlock_ kernel/locking/rtmutex.c: In function _rt_mutex_slowtrylock_: kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1473:969: error: _spinlock_t_ has no member named _rlock_ Will be looking at code now. But it looks like fixing this might be beyond my expertise. I wonder if Christoph managed to compile kernel from his side. Cheers,