From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Romain Francoise Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: fix xfrm_input/xfrm_tunnel_check oops Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:14:43 +0200 Message-ID: <877ftoi18s.fsf@orebokech.com> References: <20150402075824.GA2079@p183.telecom.by> <20150407085731.GH20559@secunet.com> <20150407114341.GA4492@p183.telecom.by> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Steffen Klassert , davem@davemloft.net, mike@normi.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: Alexey Dobriyan Return-path: Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([212.83.175.182]:34567 "EHLO stringer.orebokech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751765AbbDGMWT (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:22:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150407114341.GA4492@p183.telecom.by> (Alexey Dobriyan's message of "Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:43:41 +0300") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:43:41PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 10:58:24AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95211 >> > >> > Commit 70be6c91c86596ad2b60c73587880b47df170a41 >> > ("xfrm: Add xfrm_tunnel_skb_cb to the skb common buffer") added check >> > which dereferences ->outer_mode too early but larval SAs don't have >> > this pointer set (yet). So check for tunnel stuff later. >> > >> > Mike Noordermeer reported this bug and patiently applied all the debugging. >> > >> > Technically this is remote-oops-in-interrupt-context type of thing. >> > >> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000034 >> > IP: [] xfrm_input+0x3c2/0x5a0 >> > ... >> > [] ? xfrm4_esp_rcv+0x36/0x70 >> > [] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x9a/0x200 >> > [] ? __netif_receive_skb_core+0x6f3/0x8f0 >> > ... >> > >> > RIP [] xfrm_input+0x3c2/0x5a0 >> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan >> >> Good catch! >> >> Applied to the ipsec tree, thanks everyone! > For the record Mike confirmed that the patch works: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95211#c20 Does this only affect configurations that use VTI? It's not clear from the description. Thanks.