From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: OGAWA Hirofumi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fat: editions to support fat_fallocate() Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:19:14 +0900 Message-ID: <877gqhk64t.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> References: <1350138661-2454-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> <87lif958lb.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87txtu206u.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <878vazl6tw.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ravishankar N , Amit Sahrawat , linux-fsdevel To: Namjae Jeon Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Namjae Jeon's message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:10:03 +0900") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Namjae Jeon writes: >> Does this break the linux fat driver doesn't know about this >> fallocate()? If so, it sounds like to be easy to break existent >> drivers. > Yes, it will break linux drivers without fallocate support. When we > try to write to fallocated file using old drivers, it will cause write > error and make FS read-only. > When fallocate was implemented in other filesystem, maybe,, was there > similar issue and concern ? I guess it is not similar. Because other FS can change the spec (e.g. it can be possible to use feature compat flag for it). -- OGAWA Hirofumi