Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fat checkstyle patch set (1)

[OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>]

Cruz Julian Bishop <cruzjbishop@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi (and to the mailing list, again).
>
> This is a patch series that fixes checkpatch issues in fs/fat.
>
> I didn't get to do all of the files, but I'll be sure to come back for
> them later :)
>
> Please let me know if I did something wrong - I'll be sure to take it on
> for my next patches.

Is this for -mm tree? Please make sure there is no conflict.

Yeah, small patch is preferred, but it should be the logical separation,
and one patch would be better in this case, IMHO.

Personally, I'm not against this type cleanup only if there is no
conflict though (i.e. doesn't increase maintain cost). So, if akpm is
fine to take this, then I'm ok.

> Cruz Julian Bishop (7):
>   fs/fat: Fix a checkpatch issue in namei_msdos.c
>   fs/fat: Fix some checkpatch issues in fat.h
>   fs/fat: Changed indentation of some comments in fat.h
>   fs/fat: Fix two checkstyle issues in cache.c
>   fs/fat: Fixes some small checkpatch issues is dir.c
>   fs/fat: Fix all other checkstyle issues in dir.c
>   fs/fat: Fix checkpatch issues in fatent.c

There was one strange new line in a patch. Otherwise,

Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>