All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS: IO daisychain support fixes
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:32:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gyyin6y.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330525621-29836-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> (Tero Kristo's message of "Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:26:55 +0200")

Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> The previous version of this set was sent by Vishwanath BS, but as he
> is busy with other stuff, I am taking over.
>
> Some basic info about this set based on comments received on set v2.
> IO chain is now enabled always, and a re-trigger for the chain is
> done during hwmod enable / disable. This means that IO chain is always
> armed according to the latest pad specific WAKE_ENABLE setting, and
> if it is modified, the IO chain needs to be re-armed (thus the hooks
> within omap_hwmod code.) Having IO chain armed all the time allows us
> to receive IO event interrupts even during non-sleep states if the
> corresponding hardware module is disabled, and is unable to detect any
> IO activity itself.
>
> Version 3 contains the following changes:
>
> - global: renamed *_trigger_wuclk_ctrl funcs as *_trigger_io_chain
> - patch 3: added trigger WUCLKIN disable at the end of omap4_trigger_io_chain
>   (fix pulled from the omap4 core retention set)
> - patch 5: added function pointer for using machine specific io_chain trigger
>   function, initialized during boot
> - patch 7 dropped as the support capability for omap3 is now handled as
>   part of patch 5 init
>
> Tested on omap3 beagle + omap4 blaze boards. Suspend / resume works, and
> hwmod_io interrupts are generated. Omap4 was tested with the core retention
> support set.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

I also tested this on 3430/n900 and verified IO wakeups are working as
expected.

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Paul, as discussed on IRC, when you're OK with it, this can go through
your queue since it's mostly PRM core code.

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 0/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS: IO daisychain support fixes
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:32:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gyyin6y.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330525621-29836-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> (Tero Kristo's message of "Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:26:55 +0200")

Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> The previous version of this set was sent by Vishwanath BS, but as he
> is busy with other stuff, I am taking over.
>
> Some basic info about this set based on comments received on set v2.
> IO chain is now enabled always, and a re-trigger for the chain is
> done during hwmod enable / disable. This means that IO chain is always
> armed according to the latest pad specific WAKE_ENABLE setting, and
> if it is modified, the IO chain needs to be re-armed (thus the hooks
> within omap_hwmod code.) Having IO chain armed all the time allows us
> to receive IO event interrupts even during non-sleep states if the
> corresponding hardware module is disabled, and is unable to detect any
> IO activity itself.
>
> Version 3 contains the following changes:
>
> - global: renamed *_trigger_wuclk_ctrl funcs as *_trigger_io_chain
> - patch 3: added trigger WUCLKIN disable at the end of omap4_trigger_io_chain
>   (fix pulled from the omap4 core retention set)
> - patch 5: added function pointer for using machine specific io_chain trigger
>   function, initialized during boot
> - patch 7 dropped as the support capability for omap3 is now handled as
>   part of patch 5 init
>
> Tested on omap3 beagle + omap4 blaze boards. Suspend / resume works, and
> hwmod_io interrupts are generated. Omap4 was tested with the core retention
> support set.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

I also tested this on 3430/n900 and verified IO wakeups are working as
expected.

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Paul, as discussed on IRC, when you're OK with it, this can go through
your queue since it's mostly PRM core code.

Kevin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-06  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-29 14:26 [PATCHv3 0/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS: IO daisychain support fixes Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: correct enable/disable of daisy io chain Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26   ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Move IO Daisychain function to omap3 prm file Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26   ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01  6:49   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01  6:49     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01  8:28     ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01  8:28       ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01  8:43       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01  8:43         ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] ARM: OMAP4 PM: Add IO Daisychain support Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26   ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26   ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 17:22   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-29 17:22     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-01  6:52   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01  6:52     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01  8:25     ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01  8:25       ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 22:37     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-01 22:37       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-02  9:19       ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-02  9:19         ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-02  9:23         ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-02  9:23           ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-29 14:27 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO Daisychain support via hwmod mux Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:27   ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:27 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Remove IO Daisychain control from cpuidle Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:27   ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06  0:32 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-03-06  0:32   ` [PATCHv3 0/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS: IO daisychain support fixes Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877gyyin6y.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.