From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 4/6] OMAP3: cpuidle: next C-state decision depends on the PM QoS MPU and CORE constraints
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:43:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877h2qbp56.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuV5bV-p0kxhh8g4T076Dg3Mj89X_=4E+BpCSTdLiUmNZA@mail.gmail.com> (Jean Pihet's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:54:14 +0100")
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>> jean.pihet@newoldbits.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>>>
>>> The MPU latency figures for cpuidle include the MPU itself and also
>>> the peripherals needed for the MPU to execute instructions (e.g.
>>> main memory, caches, IRQ controller, MMU etc). On OMAP3 those
>>> peripherals belong to the MPU and CORE power domains and so the
>>> cpuidle C-states are a combination of MPU and CORE states.
>>>
>>> This patch implements the relation between the cpuidle and per-
>>> device PM QoS frameworks in the OMAP3 specific idle callbacks.
>>>
>>> The chosen C-state shall satisfy the following conditions:
>>> . the 'valid' field is enabled,
>>> . it satisfies the enable_off_mode flag,
>>
>> Not directly related to this patch, but is there any reason to keep the
>> 'enable_off_mode' flag after this series?
> enable_off_mode could be removed completely after this series unless
> there is a need to prevent OFF mode for debug reasons.
Great.
For debug reasons, we can just as easily set constraints to prevent off
mode, so I would like to see it disappear.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 13:50 [PATCH v4 0/6] PM QoS: implement the OMAP low level constraints management code jean.pihet
2011-10-19 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state jean.pihet
2011-11-17 21:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-17 21:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-22 19:44 ` Jean Pihet
2011-11-22 19:44 ` Jean Pihet
2011-10-19 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-10-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] OMAP: PM: register to the per-device PM QoS framework jean.pihet
2011-11-17 21:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-22 19:52 ` Jean Pihet
2011-11-22 19:52 ` Jean Pihet
2011-11-23 19:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-23 19:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-17 21:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] OMAP3: cpuidle: next C-state decision depends on the PM QoS MPU and CORE constraints jean.pihet
2011-11-17 21:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-22 19:54 ` Jean Pihet
2011-11-23 19:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-23 19:43 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-12-12 16:26 ` Jean Pihet
2011-12-12 16:26 ` [linux-pm] " Jean Pihet
2011-11-17 21:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] OMAP3: update cpuidle latency and threshold figures jean.pihet
2011-10-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures jean.pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877h2qbp56.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.