From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FWFdA-0005od-KW for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:34:16 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWFd8-0005nv-ST for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:34:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWFd7-0005n6-3j for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:34:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWFd6-0005n2-VO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:34:13 -0400 Received: from [194.109.24.24] (helo=smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWFeF-0000T5-GR for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:35:23 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3JGYA8U096155 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:34:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <87vetsw6yi.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87acaherxl.fsf@xs4all.nl> <44466456.7060807@nic.fi> <1145464245.9435.3.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> From: Marco Gerards Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:35:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1145464245.9435.3.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> (Hollis Blanchard's message of "Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:30:44 -0500") Message-ID: <877j5lbk13.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: grub cvs ... configfile X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:34:15 -0000 Hollis Blanchard writes: >> I think the menuentry were much better and more descriptive. I don't >> think there is a need to have both and it only confuses people. So I >> would propose to remove @-version. > > I agree. The "@" is a very odd syntax. Since "menuentry" works as well, > I think "@" should be removed. It was added because Okuji wanted something short for this. I do not care as long as there is a long command. -- Marco