From: Alex Romosan <romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: shawvrana@acm.org, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, plazmcman@softhome.net
Subject: Re: Screwy clock after apm suspend
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:15:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877jmm2fnb.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050109224711.GF1353@elf.ucw.cz> (message from Pavel Machek on Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:47:11 +0100)
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:
>> Just thought I'd add that I too am seeing a big time drift on my
>> Thinkpad (T30) without ACPI during an APM suspend w/ 2.6.10. If I can
>> help by testing patches, or providing any additional information,
>> please let me know.
>
> Probably code to compensate clock after ACPI suspend breaks apm case
> :-(.
i see problems with the clock after doing an acpi suspend. the
hardware clock is more or less okay (within a few minutes of the real
time anyway, nothing that ntp can't take care of) but the system time
is way off. this first started happening with 2.6.10-rc1. by now i've
gotten into the habit of running 'hwclock -s' by hand after each
resume. not really sure what changed and what i can do to debug/fix
this. for all it's worth i am running debian unstable.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion |
| and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-07 18:08 Screwy clock after apm suspend Shaw
2005-01-09 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 2:15 ` Alex Romosan [this message]
2005-01-10 7:28 ` Shaw
2005-01-10 7:44 ` bernard
2005-01-10 10:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 17:48 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-01-11 0:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 1:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-11 3:12 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 1:16 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-01-11 3:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 12:36 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-11 13:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 14:15 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-11 20:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 3:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-01-11 3:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 12:32 ` Mikael Pettersson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-15 18:30 Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-16 19:47 ` Alex Romosan
2004-12-29 11:38 Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-03 17:34 ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-29 0:29 Brannon Klopfer
2004-12-29 1:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877jmm2fnb.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov \
--to=romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=plazmcman@softhome.net \
--cc=shawvrana@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.