From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC243DA7E5 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 13:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.183 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779887423; cv=none; b=q9w+AwHcLauXA21Fe6zkULPXhAp5ptoqT7ndWKqacMF/cauQGdc98GuTf7cvjM3cIoHB54RNDF10STp/q+xFPHYNM68dtQHBWfTI5pJTOhvoBulqUjhW6N0Imw8b7sbLTa+hcQXTufh0QdIxukUJ3aVRzSacb/FPhUwl+J4L6Ns= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779887423; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B+Unls0TOF4hh/rnXnZmy3+eatJjJ1zg/i/4/eckkFA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=d3NeT3i0ZAIqY7G8oHZJRhlziQVimJ8+SDcAV63oSfduoNXgYesQnvaX1DTs+wWElT2qKtu/cOmPuDJPRitsuhWRkBQYwArX2pnEdAAxKVBIQE3lNQmdF1Azg/X4f2Mz5LheCDPS3rSazFQw+39p3j0Vtg8mBiVAveJ2DdfrDQk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org Received: from mop.sam.mop (1.5.5.2.4.d.e.f.f.f.5.f.9.d.6.0.a.5.c.d.c.d.9.1.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa [IPv6:2001:8b0:19dc:dc5a:6d9:f5ff:fed4:2551]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sam) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFCA73420C9; Wed, 27 May 2026 13:10:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Sam James To: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: bp@alien8.de,corbet@lwn.net,dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,hpa@zytor.com,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,mingo@redhat.com,tglx@kernel.org,x86@kernel.org,H.J. Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Start removing X86_X32_ABI In-Reply-To: <20260523093734.A3AR7reJ@linutronix.de> Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: mu4e 1.14.1; emacs 31.0.60 Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 14:10:15 +0100 Message-ID: <878q95m214.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I'm not going to claim it's a popular platform but we do have some actual users on it who pop up every so often when they hit a bug, but the kind of people who use it are often quite content to fix things themselves locally. It also works reasonably well. sam --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEBBAEWCgCpFiEEJaa7iN2bdkxrVUHCc4QJ9SDfkZAFAmoW7TgbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQyNUE2QkI4OEREOUI3NjRDNkI1NTQx QzI3Mzg0MDlGNTIwREY5MTkwDxxzYW1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzhAn1IN+RkJ/N AP0Sfeq9v+jQwriSsETR962Q8L/Rn1VJvh1lPYa+84CqpAD/e8tCkUrFMkhKUquI wycgrmB3fm2fWJjluMX0NpZsfAo= =rDP0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--