From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEF0CD4F3D for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 14:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wPi94-00045G-5P; Wed, 20 May 2026 10:43:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wPi8z-0003yh-94 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2026 10:43:33 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wPi8x-00038N-94 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2026 10:43:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1779288210; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Xva2A+JP9GMXMX4xRTA3le4X47kLPWBYE55Uc9u/Mqs=; b=L85Quk5vlJD/wdAjzptW/z6+3cu6tLmL9fQQCsOlVz4XVS5O2SIOKTWHFG3QCLJxwvZiHl mtAI6gWc9C8Kou8t1LbXnTkeO941xcv44hEMU9sPRRKVOP7LoXqmjpCNqQFFPeMFt0GUEe xZFiHXFq6wD1w2CyWUHsF9AJZFZceMc= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-604-X3Yb4V9MNb6uIL19JID76Q-1; Wed, 20 May 2026 10:43:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X3Yb4V9MNb6uIL19JID76Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: X3Yb4V9MNb6uIL19JID76Q_1779288203 Received: from mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.95]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C423D18005BB; Wed, 20 May 2026 14:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.44.22.2]) by mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40ED81684; Wed, 20 May 2026 14:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBAFC21E6A01; Wed, 20 May 2026 16:43:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Pierrick Bouvier , Brian Cain Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Fix hexagon-linux-user.mak path In-Reply-To: <8bf4fb20-d675-4569-92c2-b8921b2991e4@linaro.org> ("Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Wed, 20 May 2026 16:05:24 +0200") References: <20260520123947.12711-1-philmd@linaro.org> <87fr3ms0oi.fsf@pond.sub.org> <57f7a25a-dce1-452f-8529-187d66a6d8de@linaro.org> <87fr3mkz26.fsf@pond.sub.org> <8bf4fb20-d675-4569-92c2-b8921b2991e4@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 16:43:19 +0200 Message-ID: <878q9ejg54.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.6 on 10.30.177.95 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: > On 20/5/26 15:09, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: >>=20 >>> On 20/5/26 14:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: >>>> On 20/5/26 14:52, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: 812b31d3f91 ("configs: rename default-configs to configs and = reorganise") >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 >>>>>> --- >>>>>> =C2=A0 MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >>>>>> =C2=A0 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>>>>> index b75f3222f2f..2a4d124fb3c 100644 >>>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>>>>> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ X: target/hexagon/gen_idef_parser_funcs.py >>>>>> =C2=A0 F: linux-user/hexagon/ >>>>>> =C2=A0 F: tests/tcg/hexagon/ >>>>>> =C2=A0 F: disas/hexagon.c >>>>>> -F: configs/targets/hexagon-linux-user/default.mak >>>>>> +F: configs/targets/hexagon-linux-user.mak >>>>>> =C2=A0 F: docker/dockerfiles/debian-hexagon-cross.docker >>>>> >>>>> This one's wrong, too. >>>> Already fixed in Alex's tree: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260518102222.80735-2-philmd@linar= o.org/ >>>> Pierrick suggested to repost patch dependencies already queued in >>>> maintainer tree when posting series; while this seem counter >>>> productive it could indeed have saved us time. >>>> >>>>> I have an unsent patch fixing both.=C2=A0 In fact, I have an unsent s= eries >>>>> fixing *all* F: patterns that don't resolve to any file. >>> >>> I looked for your series without success, then realized you mentioned >>> it is "unsent". This patch is still valid then. >> >> Yes. >>=20 >>> Why mention unsent wor= k? >> To avoid duplicated work. > > I'm not sure this thread is making sense o_O Are we talking past each other? > Let's try to figure what you meant here. I'm not racing to get > this patch in nor enjoying duplicating work, but this is the > mailing list rules (due to the intrinsic email workflow latency, > not to mention subscriber processing their INBOX in FIFO mode). Let me recap the obvious :) 1. First workable patch on the list has priority, with a generous interpretation of "workable". 2. If a workable patch on the list overlaps with one I haven't sent, I rebase mine onto it. No arguing, no whining. In fact, I did exactly that, and then told you: "I've been picking [your patches] into my tree". When my patches are ready, I intend to post them with a bunch of Based-on: pointing to yours, or include yours with mine, whatever feels more convenient. Okay? > See for example last week at least 3 developers fixed the same > GCC warning issue. Generically, how could we improve that? I don't have better ideas than "watch the mailing list", and "let the right people know what you're doing". >>>> Oh :( I already sent various patches about that yesterday :( >> >> I've been picking them into my tree as I went. I may have missed the >> odd patch, but I'll fix that. >>=20 >>>>> >>>>>> =C2=A0 F: gdbstub/gdb-xml/hexagon*.xml >>>>>> =C2=A0 T: git https://github.com/quic/qemu.git hex-next >>=20