From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 820C5D637B2 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 07:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vWqyl-0006Pq-MH; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 02:02:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vWqyh-0006Ok-A4 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 02:02:12 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vWqyf-0003XS-NO for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 02:02:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1766214127; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r8GmXXJVGSvqH/mXF5iW9X3tMCYUct1UQNzlmPRa6Gk=; b=ajmi4lp8eLvJQJrdxlbjawmvEpAC6Qu4+GyeUwsX6ihyAOYDRW9M1uzbqVguEhHWN0NHIL yhQGsoantnRmO3fxI3tlKHBoETuMjJN866ylQjV87+wKvRjWRyN1tzSbTnZTkN8sxZHFe/ 9qHLe1h/wj9xB1lK9SpXdyNx+ufH0M4= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-487-pTCC3cQKNRWGPYkQ6AlN0Q-1; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 02:02:04 -0500 X-MC-Unique: pTCC3cQKNRWGPYkQ6AlN0Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: pTCC3cQKNRWGPYkQ6AlN0Q_1766214124 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80733195DE48; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 07:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.45.242.7]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CEC1800669; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 07:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91BD821E6A27; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:02:00 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Jackson Donaldson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Subject: Re: MAX78000 machine needs a maintainer In-Reply-To: (Jackson Donaldson's message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:59:49 -0500") References: <87ike27ucd.fsf@pond.sub.org> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:02:00 +0100 Message-ID: <878qex3ac7.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Jackson Donaldson writes: > Hello, > >> You added the MAX78000FTHR machine in the v10.1 development cycle. >> Would you be willing to serve as its maintainer? > > I don't think I'm a good choice for a maintainer. I no longer have access > to a physical MAX78000FTHR to verify against, since submitting those > patches I have joined a company with a restrictive IP agreement, and I'm > fairly low on time in which I could contribute. > > - Jackson Donaldson Thanks for your quick reply! Would've been nice to have you onboard. Out of curiosity, what was your motivation to add the machine?