All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 06/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Add for_each_oa_unit
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:32:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878qhewnjo.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOflfRPZBJLT2Eeh@soc-5CG1426VCC.clients.intel.com>

On Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:40:29 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>

Hi Umesh,

> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 04:31:23PM -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 02:17:53PM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> >> Add a for_each_oa_unit iterator, which eliminates code duplication when
> >> iterating over OA units obtained from OA unit query.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> >> index 012f5929ce..bc71bfcd30 100644
> >> --- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> >> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> >> @@ -477,18 +477,21 @@ static struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *oa_unit_engine(struct drm_xe_oa_unit
> >>	return !oau ? NULL : oau->num_engines ? &oau->eci[random() % oau->num_engines] : NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#define for_each_oa_unit(qoa, oau, poau, i) \
> >> +	for (i = 0, qoa = xe_oa_units(drm_fd), poau = (u8 *)&qoa->oa_units[0]; \
> >> +	     oau = (struct drm_xe_oa_unit *)poau, i < qoa->num_oa_units; \
> >> +	     poau += sizeof(*oau) + oau->num_engines * sizeof(oau->eci[0]), i++)
> >> +
> >> static struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oa_unit_by_id(int fd, int n)
> >> {
> >> -	struct drm_xe_query_oa_units *qoa = xe_oa_units(fd);
> >> +	struct drm_xe_query_oa_units *qoa;
> >>	struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oau;
> >>	u8 *poau;
> >> +	int i;
> >>
> >> -	poau = (u8 *)&qoa->oa_units[0];
> >> -	for (int i = 0; i < qoa->num_oa_units; i++) {
> >> -		oau = (struct drm_xe_oa_unit *)poau;
> >> +	for_each_oa_unit(qoa, oau, poau, i) {
> >>		if (oau->oa_unit_id == n)
> >>			return oau;
> >> -		poau += sizeof(*oau) + oau->num_engines * sizeof(oau->eci[0]);
> >>	}
> >>
> >>	return NULL;
> >> @@ -496,16 +499,14 @@ static struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oa_unit_by_id(int fd, int n)
> >>
> >> static struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oa_unit_by_type(int fd, int t)
> >> {
> >> -	struct drm_xe_query_oa_units *qoa = xe_oa_units(fd);
> >> +	struct drm_xe_query_oa_units *qoa;
> >>	struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oau;
> >>	u8 *poau;
> >> +	int i;
> >>
> >> -	poau = (u8 *)&qoa->oa_units[0];
> >> -	for (int i = 0; i < qoa->num_oa_units; i++) {
> >> -		oau = (struct drm_xe_oa_unit *)poau;
> >> +	for_each_oa_unit(qoa, oau, poau, i) {
> >>		if (oau->oa_unit_type == t)
> >>			return oau;
> >> -		poau += sizeof(*oau) + oau->num_engines * sizeof(oau->eci[0]);
> >>	}
> >>
> >>	return NULL;
> >
> > If it's possible to keep the interface for iterators simple, I would go
> > for that. i, poau can be hidden from the caller. Something like this:
> >
> > // NOTE: not compiled/tested
> >
> > static u32 xe_oa_first_unit(int fd, struct drm_xe_oa_unit **oau)
> > {
> >        struct drm_xe_query_oa_units *qoa = xe_oa_units(fd);
> >        *oau = &qoa->oa_units[0];
> >
> >        return qoa->num_oa_units;
> > }
> >
> > static void xe_oa_next_unit(struct drm_xe_oa_unit **oau)
> > {
> >	struct drm_xe_oa_unit *poau = *oau;
> >
> >        return (u8 *)poau + sizeof(*poau) + poau->num_engines * sizeof(poau->eci[0]);
>
> Not return, but update *oau.
>
> *oau = (u8 *)poau + sizeof(*poau) + poau->num_engines * sizeof(poau->eci[0]);

In v2, I have implemented something not identical, but very close to
this. But thanks for this suggestion, it has resulted in some cleaned up
code.

Ashutosh



>
> > }
> >
> > #define for_each_oa_unit(fd, oau) \
> >        for (u32 i = 0, num = xe_oa_first_unit(fd, &oau); \
> >             oau && i < num; \
> >             i++, xe_oa_next_unit(&oau))
> >
> > static const struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oa_unit_by_id(int fd, int n)
> > {
> >        struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oau;
> >
> >        for_each_oa_unit(fd, oau) {
> >                if (oau->oa_unit_id == n)
> >                        return oau;
> >        }
> >
> >        return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > static const struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oa_unit_by_type(int fd, int t)
> > {
> >        struct drm_xe_oa_unit *oau;
> >
> >        for_each_oa_unit(fd, oau) {
> >                if (oau->oa_unit_type == t)
> >                        return oau;
> >        }
> >
> >        return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Umesh
> >
> >
> >
> >> --
> >> 2.48.1
> >>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-13 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 21:17 [PATCH i-g-t 00/18] Change OA IGT's to run on all OA units Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 01/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Add OAM formats to lnl_oa_formats Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 21:55   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 02/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Get rid of unnecessary DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_ENGINE_INSTANCE Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 21:55   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 03/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rename nth_oa_unit to oa_unit_by_id Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 21:56   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-10 21:31     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 04/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Change oa_unit_engine to take an oa_unit argument Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 22:40   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 23:19     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-10-08 23:33       ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 05/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Add oa_unit_by_type Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 22:42   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 06/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Add for_each_oa_unit Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 23:31   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-09 16:40     ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-13 20:32       ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 07/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert test_oa_formats to take an OA unit argument Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:22   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 08/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert several more tests to take OA unit arguments Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:24   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 09/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert test_non_zero_reason to take an OA unit argument Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:24   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 10/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert blocking/polling tests to take OA unit arguments Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:25   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 11/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert test_mi_rpc to take an OA unit argument Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:26   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 12/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert test_single_ctx_render_target_writes_a_counter Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:27   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 13/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert OA buffer mmap tests to take OA unit arguments Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:28   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 14/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert MMIO trigger " Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:29   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 15/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Convert sync " Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:30   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 16/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Run test_oa_unit_exclusive_stream on multiple OA units Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:31   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 17/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Add new non-zero-reason-all test Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-10 22:32   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-10-08 21:18 ` [PATCH i-g-t 18/18] tests/intel/xe_oa: Constify arguments to various functions Ashutosh Dixit
2025-10-08 22:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Change OA IGT's to run on all OA units Patchwork
2025-10-08 22:39 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-09  1:49 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-09 11:47 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878qhewnjo.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.