From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45CA2749EC; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 20:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752609819; cv=none; b=HrmS2ar4KVaxj5/w/JBqwDdagRkm5om7B+kX4R7vP7Oska8ByT17L7DVTX1ZCka2KAiTj/Mgy6WpZcRuMMeEaqnfyzYBfcwWPBQktAAwwDVvLGIjPpdCQ3K5FjUqsd/TLYlRkM/Elv3ldWfzDuZhxteqppiRHZuSeMKguxUjvaM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752609819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hWcwwSCIE1juPICXC7jR+4JoO+FPPx/JLkJnjiyX7Iw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mx7VDMgYbVp9AD7MRq1bV9GgcUH38248tz3RAbe0A8mi6uX6O1PQLCy6H5KAU0qXAxPqKlA+WiOz3q+41cPd0QexDsIUa0rEGNmBe98xVxZ6sabUPO0WCxllzw6Fj05n++DMlBP13eoUP1tSHCf8bC0TlFnA9hQgbxYVEPCKpjY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=pLbFDViD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="pLbFDViD" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 9F8524040B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1752609816; bh=5kPEQacK23+5d9HZEBwKwlf08U1WgpD16N1/izqmHtU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pLbFDViDIrgJL8ZQateU2gyMeDQgIUGqckKBl894fT8zEhfferjsoQNUJfu/F2kmi bHgqmunluMg8/CrAP+1xeAzeyBkwb9k/D8gjRgUcLUtOue7x0CQjovVXSpittsvf8z QHuolRJl87REBezg0rRnN0jj+EqXpjmuFqUtc9a8Js+uKkCDBjoD5CsAi7GwFpawto N97D86OaxcchGHK0hiv4wr35SrKHUfZUNx1UUfyju4YWpNfSs3xE8Z4miAkT0VNoil DaHSRLO19jjiyqSuJMJn7MDoLLiQh2Yx9AB8i0FtGQmhUrD1RtCeNjc96fpMMNIzN4 7g8TuYdwWsqRg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F8524040B; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 20:03:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Linux PowerPC , Linux Networking Cc: Richard Cochran , Haren Myneni , Bagas Sanjaya , Madhavan Srinivasan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Donnellan , Michael Ellerman , Nathan Lynch Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ioctl numbers list cleanup for papr-physical-attestation.h In-Reply-To: <20250714015711.14525-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> References: <20250714015711.14525-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:03:35 -0600 Message-ID: <878qkpfch4.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Bagas Sanjaya writes: > Hi, > > This is the cleanup series following up from 03c9d1a5a30d93 ("Documentation: > Fix description format for powerpc RTAS ioctls"). It is based on docs-next > tree. The end result should be the same as my previous fixup patch [1]. > > Enjoy! > > Changes since v1 (RESEND) [2]: > > * Add Fixes: and Reviewed-by: trailers (Haren) > * Expand tabs for uapi/misc/amd-apml.h to match other entries > > Jon: Would you like to apply this series on docs-next or should powerpc > folks handle it? I've applied it. I took out the vast pile of Fixes tags, though; I don't think all that was justified for these tweaks. Thanks, jon