From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 169031D934D; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742251753; cv=none; b=VzRLtv8DmhbLdq5lIfk+gA4+jKXFYEGhhLHw80m7M9tVp4P/S0cIAgsOOrmu97rmAYRKmYLLJyUnpEvllUUTQ8IyErT62yVHownkqqn8Xrr9XtRAnBy+Y4QEEYfwnAtFvJ0YIKrNUsgTufyaMaRH2TOnw5EUjyKLIS/Qx4S5JBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742251753; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NGELh5FK8qxoafb9BF1ie8d4BLSd7FdWC4zqeQ+Rxac=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=J6VM+Zdb65rsyKnMwPc7StbfXrMkojLDGx/BUCVMbwEcb/iGr1Xw1hJK+RNtUxePs7rN5qHQ3w1lURFABBwVJxv+KgjmYWTZyTEx2byzx+Vw0F6fgj7QBgvv6eMxRE0HzRexzqBXT7OTodFn6RZeRMbJ2xofcNhD6ZEqhn/s5KU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=KLGgCNcW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="KLGgCNcW" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2CD4641081 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1742251750; bh=6PN7nApfM8X3fCGrZAu8H3kE5UNylVr653ipaeqlmtE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=KLGgCNcWvvI6Y3yEwPPqklYWBk3UrzBO2iFMqx9MPIei57VVTGRMxiW1kKUImh7Hb 6snMD3IfD9S2r2MoSxL76n1DgnxII0bCBd6gFnmNvKOlZSHhPDyrF68JtIVAuBbhtr /G3UVvPqlbjs27GiOBL4xcxL9ANOUpdEaSpB0C7fyqxz78ZvTUTTFUK4yDqjMd5SAi ncmG4nO2LHTmCZ9sCTIltU+66XtGg4t8ZYwxhQJsPnpbmLKSHwA0sl9oDRdpyXfyBa 5kC8bJtVFOFftAmVCd8xCix7JIVrZwlJ9aHbPpDqCRJrQHIBDzo4+t2/vAOiaS4bzG FYKtP2FZgbAPg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CD4641081; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:49:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , Simona Vetter , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: clarify rules wrt tagging other people In-Reply-To: <87jz8tlvqa.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> References: <588cf2763baa8fea1f4825f4eaa7023fe88bb6c1.1738852082.git.linux@leemhuis.info> <87y0ydzn1q.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <8b87b297-b68b-4276-95ae-e04650c3360f@leemhuis.info> <875xl7nfxg.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <431b3825-8ed6-4da2-af9d-4f95e9d08606@leemhuis.info> <87jz8tlvqa.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:49:09 -0600 Message-ID: <878qp3e0ii.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jonathan Corbet writes: > Sorry for being slow ... but also, I guess, for not communicating my > point very well. My concern wasn't about somebody not wanting to appear > in the repository at all; it was more with somebody not wanting their > tag in a specific patch where they had not offered it. > > It seems I'm the only one who is worried about this, though. It seems > like we should go ahead and get this change in before the merge window > hits. OK, I have gone ahead and applied it ... though I'm still not 100% comfortable with the wording as it is... :) Thanks, jon