Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: dt: fix documented Primecell compatible string

[Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, May 01 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/04/2023 10:31, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 24 2023, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>> Only arm,primecell is documented as compatible string for Primecell
>>> peripherals. Current code agrees with that.
>> 
>> Once again my patches do not show up in patchwork. But they do show in
>> lore:
>> 
>>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/9e137548c4e76e0d8deef6d49460cb37897934ca.1682333574.git.baruch@tkos.co.il/
>
> You used subject prefix which targets Doc subsystem, but did not Cc Doc
> maintainers (get_maintainers do not print them). If you target Rob's
> Patchwork, probably you need to fix subject prefix. There is no "dt" prefix.

Thanks for the tip.

All previous commits touching Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst
use 'docs' for subject prefix, including one from Rob. I followed this
example.

As for patchwork, I believe you refer to this one

  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/list/

Not all patches on the list use dt-bindings for subject prefix. For
example

  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230317053415.2254616-2-frowand.list@gmail.com/

The DT submitting-patches document
(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst) mentions the
dt-bindings subject prefix rule. But this patch does not touch binding
documentation.

Is there anything I should do differently to get this patch applied?

Thanks,
baruch

-- 
                                                     ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -