From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: consider cpus on nodes are unbalanced
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:33:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rxdl55u.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211029082730.6728-1-yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Rei,
On Fri, Oct 29 2021 at 17:27, Rei Yamamoto wrote:
Cc'ing a few people who worked on this code.
> If cpus on a node are offline at boot time, there are
> difference in the number of nodes between when building affinity
> masks for present cpus and when building affinity masks for possible
> cpus. This patch fixes 2 problems caused by the difference of the
> number of nodes:
>
> - If some unused vectors remain after building masks for present cpus,
> remained vectors are assigned for building masks for possible cpus.
> Therefore "numvecs <= nodes" condition must be
> "vecs_to_assign <= nodes_to_assign". Fix this problem by making this
> condition appropriate.
>
> - The routine of "numvecs <= nodes" condition can overwrite bits of
> masks for present cpus in building masks for possible cpus. Fix this
> problem by making CPU bits, which is not target, not changing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/affinity.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index f7ff8919dc9b..1cdf89e5e2fb 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -267,10 +267,16 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> * If the number of nodes in the mask is greater than or equal the
> * number of vectors we just spread the vectors across the nodes.
> */
> - if (numvecs <= nodes) {
> + if (numvecs - (curvec - firstvec) <= nodes) {
> for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
> + unsigned int ncpus;
> +
> + cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
> + ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
> + if (!ncpus)
> + continue;
> cpumask_or(&masks[curvec].mask, &masks[curvec].mask,
> - node_to_cpumask[n]);
> + nmsk);
> if (++curvec == last_affv)
> curvec = firstvec;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-29 8:27 [PATCH] irq: consider cpus on nodes are unbalanced Rei Yamamoto
2021-11-24 19:33 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-12-15 1:57 ` Rei Yamamoto
2021-12-15 4:33 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-17 2:48 ` Rei Yamamoto
2021-12-17 6:57 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-17 7:12 ` Rei Yamamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rxdl55u.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.