All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/14] qapi/introspect.py: create a typed 'Annotated' data strutcure
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 15:47:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878s85tdh3.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202174651.2274166-9-jsnow@redhat.com> (John Snow's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2021 12:46:45 -0500")

John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:

> Presently, we use a tuple to attach a dict containing annotations
> (comments and compile-time conditionals) to a tree node. This is
> undesirable because dicts are difficult to strongly type; promoting it
> to a real class allows us to name the values and types of the
> annotations we are expecting.
>
> In terms of typing, the Annotated<T> type serves as a generic container
> where the annotated node's type is preserved, allowing for greater
> specificity than we'd be able to provide without a generic.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
> ---
>  scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
> index b82efe16f6e..2b90a52f016 100644
> --- a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
> +++ b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
> @@ -13,8 +13,12 @@
>  from typing import (
>      Any,
>      Dict,
> +    Generic,
> +    Iterable,
>      List,
>      Optional,
> +    Tuple,
> +    TypeVar,
>      Union,
>  )
>  
> @@ -51,15 +55,25 @@
>  _scalar = Union[str, bool, None]
>  _nonscalar = Union[Dict[str, _stub], List[_stub]]
>  _value = Union[_scalar, _nonscalar]
> -# TreeValue = Union[_value, 'Annotated[_value]']
> +TreeValue = Union[_value, 'Annotated[_value]']

You need to quote 'Annotated[_value]', because it's a forward
reference.

Dependency cycle:

        +-----------------------------------------------+
        |                                               |
    TreeValue = Union[_value, 'Annotated[_value]']      |
                                   |                    |
        +--------------------------+                    |
        |                                               |
    Annotated(Generic[_NodeT])                          |
                         |                              |
       +-----------------+                              |
       |                                                |
    _NodeT = TypeVar('_NodeT', bound=TreeValue          |
                                         |              |
                                         +--------------+

Meh.  We'll live.

>  
> -def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, comment=None):
> -    extra = {
> -        'if': ifcond,
> -        'comment': comment,
> -    }
> -    return (obj, extra)
> +_NodeT = TypeVar('_NodeT', bound=TreeValue)

Can you teach me what NodeT is about?

> +
> +
> +class Annotated(Generic[_NodeT]):
> +    """
> +    Annotated generally contains a SchemaInfo-like type (as a dict),
> +    But it also used to wrap comments/ifconds around scalar leaf values,
> +    for the benefit of features and enums.
> +    """
> +    # Remove after 3.7 adds @dataclass:

Make this

       # TODO Remove after Python 3.7 ...

to give us a fighting chance to remember.

> +    # pylint: disable=too-few-public-methods
> +    def __init__(self, value: _NodeT, ifcond: Iterable[str],
> +                 comment: Optional[str] = None):

Why not simply value: _value?

> +        self.value = value
> +        self.comment: Optional[str] = comment
> +        self.ifcond: Tuple[str, ...] = tuple(ifcond)
>  
>  
>  def _tree_to_qlit(obj, level=0, suppress_first_indent=False):
> @@ -67,24 +81,20 @@ def _tree_to_qlit(obj, level=0, suppress_first_indent=False):
>      def indent(level):
>          return level * 4 * ' '
>  
> -    if isinstance(obj, tuple):
> -        ifobj, extra = obj
> -        ifcond = extra.get('if')
> -        comment = extra.get('comment')
> -
> +    if isinstance(obj, Annotated):
>          # NB: _tree_to_qlit is called recursively on the values of a key:value
>          # pair; those values can't be decorated with comments or conditionals.
>          msg = "dict values cannot have attached comments or if-conditionals."
>          assert not suppress_first_indent, msg
>  
>          ret = ''
> -        if comment:
> -            ret += indent(level) + '/* %s */\n' % comment
> -        if ifcond:
> -            ret += gen_if(ifcond)
> -        ret += _tree_to_qlit(ifobj, level)
> -        if ifcond:
> -            ret += '\n' + gen_endif(ifcond)
> +        if obj.comment:
> +            ret += indent(level) + '/* %s */\n' % obj.comment
> +        if obj.ifcond:
> +            ret += gen_if(obj.ifcond)
> +        ret += _tree_to_qlit(obj.value, level, suppress_first_indent)

Why do you need to pass suppress_first_indent now?

> +        if obj.ifcond:
> +            ret += '\n' + gen_endif(obj.ifcond)
>          return ret
>  
>      ret = ''
> @@ -201,7 +211,7 @@ def _use_type(self, typ):
>  
>      @staticmethod
>      def _gen_features(features):
> -        return [_make_tree(f.name, f.ifcond) for f in features]
> +        return [Annotated(f.name, f.ifcond) for f in features]
>  
>      def _gen_tree(self, name, mtype, obj, ifcond, features):
>          comment: Optional[str] = None
> @@ -215,7 +225,7 @@ def _gen_tree(self, name, mtype, obj, ifcond, features):
>          obj['meta-type'] = mtype
>          if features:
>              obj['features'] = self._gen_features(features)
> -        self._trees.append(_make_tree(obj, ifcond, comment))
> +        self._trees.append(Annotated(obj, ifcond, comment))
>  
>      def _gen_member(self, member):
>          obj = {'name': member.name, 'type': self._use_type(member.type)}
> @@ -223,7 +233,7 @@ def _gen_member(self, member):
>              obj['default'] = None
>          if member.features:
>              obj['features'] = self._gen_features(member.features)
> -        return _make_tree(obj, member.ifcond)
> +        return Annotated(obj, member.ifcond)
>  
>      def _gen_variants(self, tag_name, variants):
>          return {'tag': tag_name,
> @@ -231,16 +241,17 @@ def _gen_variants(self, tag_name, variants):
>  
>      def _gen_variant(self, variant):
>          obj = {'case': variant.name, 'type': self._use_type(variant.type)}
> -        return _make_tree(obj, variant.ifcond)
> +        return Annotated(obj, variant.ifcond)
>  
>      def visit_builtin_type(self, name, info, json_type):
>          self._gen_tree(name, 'builtin', {'json-type': json_type}, [], None)
>  
>      def visit_enum_type(self, name, info, ifcond, features, members, prefix):
> -        self._gen_tree(name, 'enum',
> -                       {'values': [_make_tree(m.name, m.ifcond, None)
> -                                   for m in members]},
> -                       ifcond, features)
> +        self._gen_tree(
> +            name, 'enum',
> +            {'values': [Annotated(m.name, m.ifcond) for m in members]},
> +            ifcond, features
> +        )
>  
>      def visit_array_type(self, name, info, ifcond, element_type):
>          element = self._use_type(element_type)
> @@ -257,12 +268,12 @@ def visit_object_type_flat(self, name, info, ifcond, features,
>          self._gen_tree(name, 'object', obj, ifcond, features)
>  
>      def visit_alternate_type(self, name, info, ifcond, features, variants):
> -        self._gen_tree(name, 'alternate',
> -                       {'members': [
> -                           _make_tree({'type': self._use_type(m.type)},
> -                                      m.ifcond, None)
> -                           for m in variants.variants]},
> -                       ifcond, features)
> +        self._gen_tree(name, 'alternate', {'members': [

I think I'd prefer another line break after 'alternate', to get
{'members': align...

> +                Annotated({'type': self._use_type(m.type)}, m.ifcond)
> +                for m in variants.variants
> +            ]},

... with ]}.

> +            ifcond, features
> +        )
>  
>      def visit_command(self, name, info, ifcond, features,
>                        arg_type, ret_type, gen, success_response, boxed,



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 17:46 [PATCH v4 00/14] qapi: static typing conversion, pt2 John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] qapi/introspect.py: assert schema is not None John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] qapi/introspect.py: use _make_tree for features nodes John Snow
2021-02-03 13:49   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] qapi/introspect.py: add _gen_features helper John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] qapi/introspect.py: guard against ifcond/comment misuse John Snow
2021-02-03 14:08   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-03 20:42     ` John Snow
2021-02-03 21:18       ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-04 15:06       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] qapi/introspect.py: Unify return type of _make_tree() John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] qapi/introspect.py: replace 'extra' dict with 'comment' argument John Snow
2021-02-03 14:23   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-03 21:21     ` John Snow
2021-02-04  8:37       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] qapi/introspect.py: Introduce preliminary tree typing John Snow
2021-02-03 14:30   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-03 21:40     ` John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] qapi/introspect.py: create a typed 'Annotated' data strutcure John Snow
2021-02-03 14:47   ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2021-02-03 21:50     ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-04 15:37       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-04 16:20         ` John Snow
2021-02-04 16:28         ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-05  8:45           ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-03 23:12     ` John Snow
2021-02-05  9:10       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] qapi/introspect.py: improve _tree_to_qlit error message John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] qapi/introspect.py: improve readability of _tree_to_qlit John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] qapi/introspect.py: add type hint annotations John Snow
2021-02-03 15:15   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-03 23:27     ` John Snow
2021-02-05 13:42       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-08 21:39         ` John Snow
2021-02-08 21:53           ` John Snow
2021-02-09  9:06           ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-10 17:31             ` John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] qapi/introspect.py: add introspect.json dummy types John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] qapi/introspect.py: Add docstring to _tree_to_qlit John Snow
2021-02-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] qapi/introspect.py: Update copyright and authors list John Snow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878s85tdh3.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.