Re: [PATCH v5 10/20] docs/interop: Convert qemu-ga-ref to rST

[Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>]

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 15:13, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 13:01, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> If you'd prefer to (re-)add it later, stick in TODO comment.
>> >
>> > Where would you want a TODO to be ?
>>
>> Before the patch, the licensing information is in
>> docs/interop/qemu-ga-ref.texi.  That file gets replaced by
>> docs/interop/qemu-ga-ref.rst, losing the licensing information.  What
>> about putting the TODO right there?
>
> I can if you insist, but what makes that .rst file any
> different from all the other .rst files we have in docs/
> which go into our various manuals and don't have explicit
> licensing comments or reader-visible text?
>
> If we want to improve how we inform readers of the docs
> license, we might:
>  * add a license note to the existing copyright footer line
>  * or to have every page to have a larger copyright/license
>    text section at the bottom
>  * or to have the interop and other manuals have a license.rst
>    like the system manual does currently,
> and none of those changes would require editing qemu-ga-ref.rst
> or qemu-qmp-ref.rst, because the overall problem being addressed
> isn't specific to those parts of the documentation, it's a
> wider one that you'd fix in a different place.

My first preference is keeping the licensing information.  How to keep
it is up to you.

If you'd prefer not to in this series, then all I ask for is a reminder
*somewhere* that we've lost licensing information, and should put it
back.  You choose where to put it and how to phrase it.  But since you
asked, I made a suggestion.  Feel free to choose anther place or
phrasing.