From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74352C38A2A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 12:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BA5208DB for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 12:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="fHqQ6+2V" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 40BA5208DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52602 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX1hC-00061P-BS for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 08:01:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX1gS-00056N-Pz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 08:00:52 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:42827 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX1gQ-0005LJ-Bk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 08:00:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588939248; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Is8ZbMlKtRkifS3NeHdd4Kue5Bctj87j6SyPvFK3yFI=; b=fHqQ6+2VOmjTjiQXwbAW8I3PQxpMnZVdWeFtKyU+ZNBYo61boamr1pZS0oVJsASAGLV71K mBlsmOJ1VhkCeuKtcYdjT/dai46DL0t2Vz8ncJ9luu1pipYs4FR7p5nA1eRwq4yIwYi6k+ 0iM5uJZaJGtxICN9NLqe2lC0rtfHjpk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-36-qjK3GdbuOxasGXgi_syzcg-1; Fri, 08 May 2020 08:00:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qjK3GdbuOxasGXgi_syzcg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A6BE80058A; Fri, 8 May 2020 12:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-113-6.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.6]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30C1605CE; Fri, 8 May 2020 12:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2118211358BC; Fri, 8 May 2020 14:00:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/18] s390x/cpumodel: Fix UI to CPU features pcc-cmac-{aes, eaes}-256 References: <20200505152926.18877-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20200505152926.18877-10-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 14:00:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: (David Hildenbrand's message of "Wed, 6 May 2020 13:41:11 +0200") Message-ID: <878si2myac.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/08 08:00:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: berrange@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com, Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" David Hildenbrand writes: > On 05.05.20 17:29, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and >> s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is >> "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". The former is obviously a pasto. >>=20 >> Impact: >>=20 >> * s390_feat_bitmap_to_ascii() misidentifies S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256 >> as "pcc-cmac-eaes-256". Affects QMP commands query-cpu-definitions, >> query-cpu-model-expansion, query-cpu-model-baseline, >> query-cpu-model-comparison, and the error message when >> s390_realize_cpu_model() fails in check_compatibility(). >>=20 >> * s390_cpu_list() also misidentifies it. Affects -cpu help. >>=20 >> * s390_cpu_model_register_props() creates CPU property >> "pcc-cmac-eaes-256" twice. The second one fails, but the error is >> ignored (a later commit will change that). Results in a single >> property "pcc-cmac-eaes-256" with the description for >> S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256, and no property for >> S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256. CPU properties are visible in CLI -cpu >> and -device, QMP & HMP device_add, QMP device-list-properties, and >> QOM introspection. >>=20 >> Fix by deleting the wayward 'e'. > > You dropped the comment regarding msa4, was that intended? Accident, will put it back. Glad you're paying attention!