From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
"C.J. Jameson" <cjcjameson@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cherry-pick: set default `--mainline` parent to 1
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:12:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sx8lpqw.fsf@javad.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlg18srrp.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:47:22 +0900")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> To put it a bit differently, I share with you that picking merges
>>> should be deliberate and it is safer to make sure allowing it only
>>> when the told us that s/he knows the commit being picked is a merge,
>>
>> Something like "--[no-]ban-merges" then [*], having "--ban-merges" as
>> default?
>>
>>> but when we started allowing "-m 1" for non-merge commits in the
>>> current world where cherry-pick can work on a range, the ship has
>>> already sailed.
>>
>> Except that it could be a different ship, provided we've got
>> "--ban-merges". Having "-m 1" as default stops to be an issue, and
>> explicit "-m 1" could then imply --no-ban-merges, that could be in turn
>> overwritten by explicit "--ban-merges", if necessary.
>
> The same effect can be had by just reverting "let's allow -m1 for
> single-parent commit", can't it? That is a far simpler solution, I
> would say.
Those one didn't introduce the issue currently at hand, as we still
don't allow merges by default, so why do we need to rewind it?
-- Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-21 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 3:54 [RFC PATCH] cherry-pick: set default `--mainline` parent to 1 C.J. Jameson
2019-03-20 4:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-20 12:01 ` Sergey Organov
2019-03-20 14:39 ` Elijah Newren
2019-03-20 15:59 ` Sergey Organov
2019-03-21 1:51 ` C.J. Jameson
2019-03-21 2:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 3:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 5:40 ` Sergey Organov
2019-03-21 5:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 6:12 ` Sergey Organov [this message]
2019-03-21 8:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 8:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 11:59 ` Sergey Organov
2019-03-22 2:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-22 15:22 ` Sergey Organov
2019-03-22 18:27 ` C.J. Jameson
2019-03-25 14:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-03-25 15:41 ` C.J. Jameson
2019-03-21 6:54 ` Sergey Organov
2019-03-22 10:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-03-22 10:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-03-20 9:44 ` Duy Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878sx8lpqw.fsf@javad.com \
--to=sorganov@gmail.com \
--cc=cjcjameson@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.