From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Split up hangcheck phases
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:27:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878tskwt48.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115164749.GF30410@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:45:41PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Split up hangcheck phases
>> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15351/
>> State : success
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> Series 15351v1 Series without cover letter
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/15351/revisions/1/mbox/
>>
>>
>> fi-bdw-5557u total:244 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
>> fi-bsw-n3050 total:244 pass:204 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
>> fi-bxt-t5700 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
>> fi-byt-j1900 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
>> fi-byt-n2820 total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
>> fi-hsw-4770 total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
>> fi-hsw-4770r total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
>> fi-ilk-650 total:244 pass:191 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
>> fi-ivb-3520m total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
>> fi-ivb-3770 total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
>> fi-kbl-7200u total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
>> fi-skl-6260u total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
>> fi-skl-6700hq total:244 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
>> fi-skl-6700k total:244 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
>> fi-skl-6770hq total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
>> fi-snb-2520m total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
>> fi-snb-2600 total:244 pass:211 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
>
> Worth asking: what's the impact on the hangcheck tests runtime within BAT?
>
Will measure.
I suspect that we will be a tad faster due to brutal
nature of igt hangs being now deterministcally detected in hangcheck
resolution accuracy...
> Presumably still the same timeouts...
and that the simplest engine fastest detection was 4.5secs
on old code. Now it is 4secs.
I just wanted second resolution the defines.
-Mika
> -Chris
>
> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 14:36 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Split up hangcheck phases Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Decouple hang detection from hangcheck period Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 16:38 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 21:32 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-16 8:07 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use request retirement as context progress Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 16:34 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Add bannable context parameter Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 16:31 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Add per client max context ban limit Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 16:27 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 17:12 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Wipe hang stats as an embedded struct Mika Kuoppala
2016-11-15 15:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Split up hangcheck phases Patchwork
2016-11-15 16:47 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 17:27 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2016-11-15 16:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878tskwt48.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.