From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btzz0-0003dR-DQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:32:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btzyz-0007Le-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:32:50 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1c8e6e73084e968514b6522576cfacd1bf69609e.1475757437.git.berto@igalia.com> <48b78d7e-3f52-79d3-27a1-19047100161b@redhat.com> <20161011145712.GF6334@noname.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:32:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20161011145712.GF6334@noname.redhat.com> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:57:12 +0200") Message-ID: <878ttu9788.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 09/16] block: Add QMP support for streaming to an intermediate layer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Alberto Garcia , qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 11.10.2016 um 16:30 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben: [...] >> 3) QEMU could advertise that feature to the client. This is probably >> simpler than trying to figure it out from the API. I guess that's the >> idea of 'qmp_capabilities'? > > I think that was the idea, though it was never used. If we had used it, > I'm not sure how long the capabilities list would be today. :-) QMP capabilities are for changes in the QMP protocol, not for changes in commands, events and types. The protocol has been good enough so far, thus no capabilities.