Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

[Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>]

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:57:43 +0900,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > It is now based on next-20150925.  As I have said before, you cannot
> > > base your linux-next included branch on a linux-next release.  You
> > > should either base it on Linus' tree, or one of the other linux-next
> > > included branches (as long as that other branch is never rebased).  
> > 
> > OK, now your tree is no longer based on a linux-next release (thanks).
> > However, you have managed to rebase a whole string of post v4.3-rc5
> > commits from Linus' tree into your tree.  This would mean that we would
> > end up with duplicates of those patches.  Please just rebase your
> > patches (and just your patches) onto some part of Linus' tree.
> 
> And now that you have merged in v4.3-rc6, just do a "git rebase
> v4.3-rc6", please (you still have duplicates of some of the patches in
> Linus' tree between -rc5 and -rc6.
> 

OK.
Fixed.

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

-- 
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>