From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58927)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@pond.sub.org>) id 1X2ib5-0000D9-VV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:07:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@pond.sub.org>) id 1X2iax-0004cp-IA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:06:51 -0400
Received: from oxygen.pond.sub.org ([144.76.244.19]:57369)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@pond.sub.org>) id 1X2iax-0004cd-BN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:06:43 -0400
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
References: <1403889855-5740-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
	<1403889855-5740-2-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
	<53B2EB0F.2050402@redhat.com> <53B2EBA0.8080108@redhat.com>
	<8738ekl05m.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <53B3C172.30606@redhat.com>
	<87fvijyfh9.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <53B41F33.7080904@redhat.com>
	<87d2dmucx6.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <53B5219E.6020609@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:06:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <53B5219E.6020609@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Thu,
	03 Jul 2014 11:25:50 +0200")
Message-ID: <878uoaa3cv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2.1 1/3] blockjob: Fix recent
	BLOCK_JOB_READY regression
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, wenchaoqemu@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> Il 03/07/2014 09:19, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>>> > I think there is a page with unfinished transition.  Can you add this one?
>> Do you mean the transition to qdev?
>>
>> If yes, isn't that covered by "Making all devices QOM objects"?
>> Sometimes we create new transitions faster than we finish them...
>
> No, I meant the transition to supporting rerror/werror.  Eric started
> the patch and I edited it.

Okay.  I just added another section on I/O accounting, which is almost
as incomplete.