From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:25:39 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] gnupg: depend on libiconv if appropriate In-Reply-To: <52F0BCEC.6000905@mind.be> (Arnout Vandecappelle's message of "Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:11:56 +0100") References: <52F0BA01.5020806@mind.be> <52F0BCEC.6000905@mind.be> Message-ID: <878utrdvj0.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle writes: > On 04/02/14 10:59, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> On 30/12/13 18:57, Bernd Kuhls wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls >> >> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) >> >> Ideally, the explanation that you put in the follow-up message should be >> in the commit log, but OK. > Actually, Bernd, to make our life easier, could you repost your > iconv-related patches (including the one in xorg) with the following inj > the commit message: > If iconv is built before this package, this package will link against it; > if it is built after this package, it will not be linked against it. To > make the build reproducible, make sure that iconv is always built before > this package. True. I already applied the gnupg patch (but didn't push it), so I've adjusted the commit message to match. Bernd, could you resend the other patches with that commit message - Thanks. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard