From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60469)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.bennee@linaro.org>) id 1VbES9-0008O8-Th
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:55:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.bennee@linaro.org>) id 1VbES4-0002Me-JS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:55:45 -0400
Received: from static.88-198-71-155.clients.your-server.de
	([88.198.71.155]:50586 helo=socrates.bennee.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.bennee@linaro.org>) id 1VbES4-0002MQ-CV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:55:40 -0400
References: <87bo28vt03.fsf@linaro.org>
	<CAFEAcA8zrMjxqrM=Wr9-A9AXz=hNrVCKzHn9CUZ2e=Pwz=t94w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
In-reply-to: <CAFEAcA8zrMjxqrM=Wr9-A9AXz=hNrVCKzHn9CUZ2e=Pwz=t94w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:55:35 +0000
Message-ID: <878uxbx5y0.fsf@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Checking the state of arm64-linux-user
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>, qemu-devel qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>


peter.maydell@linaro.org writes:

> On 29 October 2013 18:20, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>> I'm currently at Linaro Connect and am looking at running the arm64
>> stuff through Peter's risu tool and getting an idea of the instruction
>> coverage. Alex pointed me to:
>>
>> https://github.com/susematz/qemu/tree/aarch64-1.6
>>
<snip>
> With my upstream-qemu-arm-maintainer hat on, I would suggest that
> the thing we should be building and testing is the most recent set of
> patches that has been submitted to the mailing list. I think Alex said
> doing a v2 of that is on his todo list...
<snip>

I think the problem is arm64 has been posted in several dependant patch
sets hence working from a git tree. I think for now I'll take off the
-Werror training wheels and see how far it gets.

However if you have any pointers to patchwork I can build a tree from
there as well.

-- 
Alex Bennée