From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add kvm list for virtio components Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:07:32 +0930 Message-ID: <878vet3h2r.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1341482827-13195-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20120705122225.GA30572@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120705122225.GA30572@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:22:25 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:07:07PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > The KVM list is followed by more people than the generic > > virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org mailing list, and is > > already "de facto" the place where virtio patches are posted. > > I have no data on the first statement (do you?) and I disagree with the > last statement, but have no objection to people adding kvm list as well. Well, the kvm list is far more active. It's annoying to have two lists, but it is how things are so best to document it. I'm OK with the original commit message, but MST is smarter than me, so let's do what he suggests :) Cheers, Rusty. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751914Ab2GIAjx (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2012 20:39:53 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:60258 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751113Ab2GIAjr (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2012 20:39:47 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amit.shah@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add kvm list for virtio components In-Reply-To: <20120705122225.GA30572@redhat.com> References: <1341482827-13195-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20120705122225.GA30572@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:07:32 +0930 Message-ID: <878vet3h2r.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:22:25 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:07:07PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > The KVM list is followed by more people than the generic > > virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org mailing list, and is > > already "de facto" the place where virtio patches are posted. > > I have no data on the first statement (do you?) and I disagree with the > last statement, but have no objection to people adding kvm list as well. Well, the kvm list is far more active. It's annoying to have two lists, but it is how things are so best to document it. I'm OK with the original commit message, but MST is smarter than me, so let's do what he suggests :) Cheers, Rusty.