From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5] davinci: Add additional JTAG code for AM-1808 and OMAP-L138 Rev 2.0 SoCs From: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:50:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878vz1bl8p.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D22503A.7010709@criticallink.com> (Michael Williamson's message of "Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:39:54 -0500")
Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@criticallink.com> writes:
> On 01/03/2011 05:33 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@criticallink.com> writes:
>>
>> I'm assuming the 'From:' line currently in the subject was supposed to
>> go here?
>>
>> Kevin
>
> Arg. Yes. Sorry about that; not sure how I lost the newline. Do you need me
> to resend?
No biggie, I can take care of it. Just wanted to let you know something
got messed up on the sending side.
Kevin
>>
>>> The JTAG variant code for Rev-2.0 silicon of the OMAP-L138 has changed.
>>> In addition, the variant code for the AM-1808 SoC appears to match
>>> the Rev-2.0 code for the OMAP-L138. Add an additional entry to support
>>> these chips.
>>>
>>> This patch is originally from a patch on the arago project, here:
>>> http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omapl1.git;a=commit;h=6157618435e313a444cdf059702bd34036a6e2b7
>>>
>>> Further information related to the need for this patch can be located at
>>> http://e2e.ti.com/support/embedded/f/354/p/67290/248486.aspx
>>> http://linux.davincidsp.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2010-November/021224.html
>>>
>>> This patch was tested using an AM-1808 SoC on a MityARM-1808 SoM card. It
>>> was also tested using a Rev 1.0 silicon OMAP-L138 on a MityDSP-L138F card.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@criticallink.com>
>>> Tested-by: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@criticallink.com>
>>> Reported-by: Nicolas Luna <luna.id@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Built against linux-davinci tree.
>>>
>>> Changes since v4.
>>>
>>> - removed am18x code from 0 variant per Sekhar's request.
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
>>> index 78b5ae2..1550ac3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
>>> @@ -764,6 +764,13 @@ static struct davinci_id da850_ids[] = {
>>> .cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA850,
>>> .name = "da850/omap-l138",
>>> },
>>> + {
>>> + .variant = 0x1,
>>> + .part_no = 0xb7d1,
>>> + .manufacturer = 0x017, /* 0x02f >> 1 */
>>> + .cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA850,
>>> + .name = "da850/omap-l138/am18x",
>>> + },
>>> };
>>>
>>> static struct davinci_timer_instance da850_timer_instance[4] = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-03 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-03 13:03 [PATCH v5] davinci: Add additional JTAG code for AM-1808 and OMAP-L138 Rev 2.0 SoCs From: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Michael Williamson
2011-01-03 22:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-03 22:39 ` Michael Williamson
2011-01-03 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-01-03 23:53 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878vz1bl8p.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.