From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261373AbUL2RYA (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:24:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261375AbUL2RYA (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:24:00 -0500 Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([212.9.189.169]:10940 "EHLO albireo.enyo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261373AbUL2RX6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:23:58 -0500 From: Florian Weimer To: "Josef E. Galea" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Memory management in Linux References: <41D2ABA8.2080906@euroweb.net.mt> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:23:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <41D2ABA8.2080906@euroweb.net.mt> (Josef E. Galea's message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:05:44 +0100") Message-ID: <878y7ht3v7.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Josef E. Galea: > Does the linux kernel allow a process to handle its own memory pages > instead of using the kernel's virtual memory manager? You could play some tricks using mprotect(2), but I'm not sure if this is enough for your application.