From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Thomas Sniffen Subject: Re: reiser4 non-free? Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:18:17 -0400 Message-ID: <878yg5w3eu.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> References: <4097CCA4.4060707@namesys.com> <87fzag139k.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <4099A868.9030406@slaphack.com> <20040506.083242.41632888.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <87k6zpy8ke.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <20040506143643.GB25505@raptus.homelinux.org> <877jvpy08v.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <877jvpy08v.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <409A7F98.7040609@namesys.com> <409A8B0B.2000603@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <409A8B0B.2000603@namesys.com> (Hans Reiser's message of "Thu, 06 May 2004 11:59:23 -0700") Resent-Message-ID: <8ykCY.A.2AD.-esmAB@murphy> List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Matthew Garrett , debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hans Reiser writes: > The kernel portion is GPL V2, this is the progs license..... Oh! That makes many things more clear. I know I've been assuming "reiser4 non-free" meant the filesystem, not the reference tools which manipulate it. So somebody else can reimplement them in free versions, writing from the specification. Eugh, what a pain, and what a waste, redoing all that work, but it's at least feasible. -Brian -- Brian Sniffen bts@alum.mit.edu