From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Cc: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/20] libdtrace: retain descriptors for cached module BTF IDs
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 12:59:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a4nmt8si.fsf@esperi.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56247e0c69f34acca1cc8c20ffafc4bd@oracle.com>
On 30 Oct 2026, Kris Van Hees outgrape:
> ---
> libdtrace/dt_btf.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> libdtrace/dt_impl.h | 1 +
> libdtrace/dt_open.c | 1 +
> test/triggers/module-discovery.c | 11 +++++
> 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_btf.c b/libdtrace/dt_btf.c
> index 617b0128..727e5f54 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dt_btf.c
> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_btf.c
> @@ -1479,17 +1479,67 @@ dt_btf_lookup_name_kind(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, dt_module_t *dmp, const char *name,
> return id;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Retain a descriptor as well as the ID: otherwise an unloaded object's ID
> + * could be reused and a later enumeration could mistake it for a cached one.
> + * Only IDs assigned to modules are retained, bounding descriptor use by the
> + * number of modules discovered by this handle.
> + */
I suppose just not reusing IDs in general, and having them only
increment, would end up using too many? (I can't remember under what
circumstances they're reused, but I didn't think it was *common*.)
How it interacts with the earlier change to never remove dt_modules when
their corresponding kernel module is unloaded is unclear to me -- is
this the bit that ensures that an unloaded module never gets reused (and
instead we load a new one if the module is reloaded into the kernel), or
what?
--
NULL && (void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 19:36 [PATCH 10/20] libdtrace: retain descriptors for cached module BTF IDs Kris Van Hees
2026-11-06 12:59 ` Nix [this message]
2026-11-07 15:59 ` Kris Van Hees
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a4nmt8si.fsf@esperi.org.uk \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kris.van.hees@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.