Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] complete perf_allow_* trio and use in drm/xe

["Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>]

On Wed, 27 May 2026 09:30:14 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 11:42:44AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 08:34:57PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > > On Sat, 23 May 2026 10:52:16 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 5/23/26 1:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 06:33:24PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > >>    perf/core: out-of-line and export perf_allow_cpu/tracepoint()
> > > > >>    drm/xe: gate observation streams with perf_allow_cpu()
> > > > >>
> > > > >>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.c    |  5 +++--
> > > > >>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c          | 25 +++++++++++++---------
> > > > >>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_observation.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > >>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_observation.h |  3 +--
> > > > >>   include/linux/perf_event.h          | 31 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > >>   kernel/events/core.c                | 18 ++++++++++++++++
> > > > >>   6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Sure, works for me. How do you want to route these things, Xe tree or
> > > > > -tip?
> > > >
> > > > Hi Peter,
> > > >
> > > > Maybe -tip, but really, either way is perfectly OK with me.
> > >
> > > I've R-b'd both the patches. If you want to merge via Xe tree, let me know
> > > and we can get them merged.
> >
> > To get them through drm-xe trees we need ack from performance events subsystem
> > maintainers.
> >
> > Peter, Ilgo, anyone, ack here?
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

I have submitted the patches for the Xe tree CI. Once that completes, we
will merge them:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/167137/#rev2

Thanks.
--
Ashutosh