From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C8E211CA9
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 24 May 2026 16:36:08 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1779640569; cv=none; b=CiXjWz85gUsXj8t1DQ9EGUgrJj602tMaxPDWynCZWCNNQdjR65ORQ2dyARsD6qTidtKWLeq9MREfTZ8bvJYdKx8SGuNjKBETKlvxk7FriCLdPmkmDWK1+9kg9DXhPT1jfg1ccUsYuK6wKH5Nk+7aWYu6+jLPYPYmhShODq0aRGo=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1779640569; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=XVg55na0Cb501pYyNd5CyD7zDVkQAdlrwUp4B0DS0Y0=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Jt4d2XWTrvnJQsO0eLPwO0oOyv2piwn9moIJsG27+/BAcAx3VWXSAslMI0jouo0JyZ/uRv4MIQ/ikamVUoeGPHi4A3GyLdF0Sn6vUYjre+22VyIreHJzqdVW03rFeFoSJL23/nWUd+obuUBkvJT+NqCGAzLcPd+7Aim2tM1vKzI=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lQOmloxu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lQOmloxu"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 41A491F000E9;
	Sun, 24 May 2026 16:36:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20260515; t=1779640568;
	bh=XVg55na0Cb501pYyNd5CyD7zDVkQAdlrwUp4B0DS0Y0=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
	b=lQOmloxuZ3gnlozcczB3anKLvifCqiHE2d/HXHfnOb4jpLyQEuKvdEkpV2/eb2JJN
	 WHFxd/xFzVq4azLIdSlNOKAUyOqUTjJRg19+CziDQYtlTLEvIiX7LILWy4AHJAiL3H
	 9Eon1e9HwZpJ++xML+2dH+JW/KPZHXkxJ04ujvjqDTvdhV79tR85PufbliVrCGRzY1
	 PEDeAG1bQ6d2gF+lHoQhm1t0hsq2wpyVvgebuxDD1OPPF6wXloJ/QlxDkIKIEp76Tv
	 diSzyPXe0oCmGkeW3nFwxoSIcTIm9OL/7xVsappRSwVM9OeuCvgR88J/qD56Hz03KW
	 /vppe8QnUni1w==
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Miroslav Lichvar
 <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>, Wen Gu
 <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, John Stultz
 <jstultz@google.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Anna-Maria Behnsen
 <anna-maria@linutronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
 Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>, Arnd
 Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Julien Ridoux <ridouxj@amazon.com>, Ryan Luu
 <rluu@amazon.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti
 <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] timekeeping: Fix draft tracking precision
 and add feed-forward discipline via vmclock
In-Reply-To: <87h5nwu8d6.ffs@tglx>
References: <20260517220326.4625-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>
 <agximHA2EQLdYm9T@localhost>
 <0d32da75fa88c92ac0225ef23a9045afdf2ac9fe.camel@infradead.org>
 <ag2PdZvoP4w6Oplx@localhost>
 <dc4d0d491091fc4a00b79f7294a749f731f65f23.camel@infradead.org>
 <87o6i8vcni.ffs@tglx>
 <6c7137748ccea288fdf55e7c2e24817ccc1673ef.camel@infradead.org>
 <874ijzvpl8.ffs@tglx>
 <00609fa255442648e11e2b5596a3b80a29edcfc8.camel@infradead.org>
 <87v7cftqey.ffs@tglx>
 <0b1f41d3709b18c375e6f2743547016afe2ab32c.camel@infradead.org>
 <87jyssu9dw.ffs@tglx> <87h5nwu8d6.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 18:36:04 +0200
Message-ID: <87a4tou5mz.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Sun, May 24 2026 at 17:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, May 24 2026 at 17:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> There is an existing bug in that code for the retry case. Fix below.

There is none. It's just too hot to think straight. The counterval is
updated once per retry ....