From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B36D4116C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vgLU1-0007qK-Sj; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:25:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vgLTv-0007Rg-IF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:25:39 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vgLTt-0001DP-9W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:25:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1768476328; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qmBEssY0jXCkxvgR3txCZsFqa9ddUgtti5B0iGwid1M=; b=KcJO+LrKAOCN5tNVZbHz5gYJTO9OBjBaImxm1LfExTljI9Jm/jIktdhJ0LtdZr+Hjl9bRx uPWlrOFf7SxKSiTW0bLYFa7rho7peMPkOE6oWznLC5RHFq4VcBa08WTqNGikHEjWhLQop2 50DmEdgs8BYzHh8noA2F+/PX5sVv6/o= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-544-sja2D0B5PtSjAIM56mOi8Q-1; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:25:23 -0500 X-MC-Unique: sja2D0B5PtSjAIM56mOi8Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: sja2D0B5PtSjAIM56mOi8Q_1768476322 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 706BF1956088; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.45.242.32]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0AAA1955F22; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 49CE021E692D; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:25:18 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Reinoud Zandijk Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson , Ryo ONODERA Subject: Re: [PULL 13/31] accel/nvmm: Replace @dirty field by generic CPUState::vcpu_dirty field In-Reply-To: (Reinoud Zandijk's message of "Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:29:31 +0100") References: <20250704101433.8813-1-philmd@linaro.org> <20250704101433.8813-14-philmd@linaro.org> <44ccfba7-21a3-4c24-aa6a-4b2bdb989792@redhat.com> <87v7h44pal.fsf@pond.sub.org> <87a4yg4gmo.fsf@pond.sub.org> <5279bbb4-a4b8-4c71-8275-92643b8796d7@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:25:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87a4yfxgm9.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Reinoud Zandijk writes: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 1/14/26 12:28, Reinoud Zandijk wrote: [...] >> We're not asking you to keep CI up-to-date (which Thomas is doing now, >> despite having no specific need that I know of to support NetBSD), just to >> *report* failure to build from source and tell us "hey, that's how we fixed >> it". Otherwise we have the false impression that no one even cares about >> new QEMU on NetBSD. > > As pkgsrc normally tracks releases and has a directory with local patches on > top of that, build errors only show up when we bump the version. Version 10.2 > is now in pkgsrc though I am running 10.1.3 so there is surely interest in > keeping it running. I could try to commit some more trivial patches in the > repo here to reduce the diffs some more. Fixing the build long after it broke is less than ideal. What would it take to get NetBSD covered in CI?