From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5935F38FB9 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760259281; cv=none; b=YAKezERe6ELW0C30teDVsidvKwJXv0RAqTbe2KSTNntnkgEBZ0lUzKfJRd9q1KmscYqLMiOOy7JeQzM6OG6XCo3PnR2lPCVtgsAQhmdSJOfNmCKaP4S9TGYsp36Gm6raMSERuOHlkCsdGPTcwoAkcSLPzJmulr7pkKl4LTMDVhA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760259281; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FkUjLhdyapAoBU+nG3wrdxrzhH77C0bFRsY70s9UmXo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rXpyw5pezAI2cPsPZ2gMpeu37jlFEONUD5LJc40Gs/I9NixH2ahXfEdR96gALCXuiq7D+t6mvrBTzf/sziuRYV05xPro870BolHh1q5mfaOXjU+o/nrDyjYQQ6U5Y8Vy3hT6su6HJlVFhen9HPs4hkLciXxx30qYnR1OZNnat2s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenomai.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xenomai.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xenomai.org header.i=@xenomai.org header.b=p3nWg1gw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenomai.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xenomai.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xenomai.org header.i=@xenomai.org header.b="p3nWg1gw" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7167432C5; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:54:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenomai.org; s=gm1; t=1760259271; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AK7R/Xr9fGjhhy0gphDPSxVKRuab761yqJQCDO1hH+U=; b=p3nWg1gwVtGLocf73GuCy2Otr8Z4PECyGeu4ejH6DjqSr21Hs9vr3WWRYWxvwYGRVqHYDX TesTthd69st8g+ZDHbZhZMrB22J0mlDUaxndR08JIAJgaUlUykWnwm+MGq3FH0OgF/Q6wj nZ/ZpbnvAPbvxjLG+pOaXT8WNH33iZM18qXSift6gzWIhm/R4juoJUUZG4JFFgTphwyVjn t7mjs/XrhHErvvB9Bi1L6FbRRKyr7bDx/zqXCYLS4oX29GEiewzbA+cur053rEryHHSCFA m9/HLvZzneHQMieUDc6x4QQpD5pka+fxQEwgW/H/8E2i8RHW0ZG0CVIQiq8unA== From: Philippe Gerum To: Giulio Moro Cc: Xenomai Subject: Re: Unexpected switches to in-band In-Reply-To: (Giulio Moro's message of "Sat, 11 Oct 2025 14:46:56 -0500") References: <20251009151737.0d03b211@wsk> <20676160-4572-d92d-4b33-ff4255946345@bela.io> <87qzv9sa9c.fsf@xenomai.org> <87ikgls9kh.fsf@xenomai.org> <874is5s6kw.fsf@xenomai.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.12; emacs 30.2 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 10:54:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87a51wijp5.fsf@xenomai.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: xenomai@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-GND-Sasl: rpm@xenomai.org Giulio Moro writes: >> Quick check: does "evl check" run without any output (as expected)? > > Yes > > Further update: tested v6.16-evl-rebase and it seems to have the same in-band switching issue. So far the only good one was v6.1.y-cip-evl-rebase. > >> Meanwhile, I've been trying to reproduce on x86 and armv8 (odroid c4) using the posted recipe, no luck so far. > > Thanks for giving it a try. Wanna have a look at/try my config? https://github.com/giuliomoro/linux/blob/v6.12.y-evl-rebase/.config Yep, thanks. -- Philippe.