From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 14:09:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a57v9pt4.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXE0WcenLEB+60=+oc+aKfbqZkwYZf-TrOyDY=ShXQ2pYw@mail.gmail.com>
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> writes:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 12:59, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 10:10, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
...
>> >> $(obj)/vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs-y) $(vmlinux-libs-y) FORCE
>> >> $(call if_changed,ld)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> >> index 3b2bc61c9408..d0a27905de90 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> >> @@ -49,9 +49,22 @@ SECTIONS
>> >> *(.data.*)
>> >>
>> >> /* Add 4 bytes of extra space for the obsolete CRC-32 checksum */
>> >> +#ifndef CONFIG_EFI_SBAT
>> >> . = ALIGN(. + 4, 0x200);
>> >> +#else
>> >> + /* Avoid gap between '.data' and '.sbat' */
>> >> + . = ALIGN(. + 4, 0x1000);
>> >> +#endif
>> >> _edata = . ;
>> >> }
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SBAT
>> >> + .sbat : ALIGN(0x1000) {
>> >> + _sbat = . ;
>> >> + *(.sbat)
>> >> + _esbat = ALIGN(0x200);
>> >> + . = _esbat;
>> >> + }
>> >> +#endif
>> >> . = ALIGN(L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>> >> .bss : {
>> >> _bss = . ;
>> >
>> > This looks a bit odd - see below
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/header.S b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
>> >> index b5c79f43359b..ab851490ef74 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/header.S
>> >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
>> >> @@ -207,6 +207,19 @@ pecompat_fstart:
>> >> IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
>> >> IMAGE_SCN_MEM_WRITE # Characteristics
>> >>
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SBAT
>> >> + .ascii ".sbat\0\0\0"
>> >> + .long ZO__esbat - ZO__sbat # VirtualSize
>> >> + .long setup_size + ZO__sbat # VirtualAddress
>> >> + .long ZO__esbat - ZO__sbat # SizeOfRawData
>> >> + .long setup_size + ZO__sbat # PointerToRawData
>> >> +
>> >> + .long 0, 0, 0
>> >> + .long IMAGE_SCN_CNT_INITIALIZED_DATA | \
>> >> + IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
>> >> + IMAGE_SCN_MEM_DISCARDABLE # Characteristics
>> >> +#endif
>> >> +
>> >
>> > This puts the .sbat section at the very end of the file. However, the
>> > virtual size of .data is 'ZO__end - ZO__data' not 'ZO__edata -
>> > ZO__data', and so the .sbat section will overlap with .bss in the
>> > memory view of the image.
>>
>> Missed that, will fix, thanks! A stupid question though: does this
>> matter in practice for SBAT? I don't think anyone needs SBAT data after
>> kernel starts booting so we can consider it 'discarded'. BSS data can
>> then do whatever it wants.
>>
>
> It violates the PE/COFF spec, and some PE loaders and signing tools
> are very pedantic about the layout.
Turns out it the problem is slightly harder to address then I initially
thought. On x86, arch/x86/boot/bzImage is composed of setup.bin and
vmlinux.bin and the later is produced from vmlinux with
objcopy -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux arch/x86/boot/vmlinux.bin
"objcopy -O binary" basically dumps memory representation of vmlinux. In
case we put '.sbat' before '.bss' we get:
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
...
4 .data 00002000 0000000000aef000 0000000000aef000 00af0000 2**12
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
5 .sbat 00001000 0000000000af1000 0000000000af1000 00af2000 2**12
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
6 .bss 00023078 0000000000af2000 0000000000af2000 00af3000 2**12
ALLOC
7 .pgtable 00021000 0000000000b16000 0000000000b16000 00af3000 2**12
ALLOC
...
so we can't have a single '.data' section in PE covering both '.data'
and '.bss'/'.pgtable' as '.sbat' is in the middle and we want it to be a
separate section. If we try putting '.sbat' after '.bss' we are going to
get a hole size of '.bss' + '.pgtable' in arch/x86/boot/vmlinux.bin
because 'objcopy -O binary' is not going to squeeze anything (and it has
no idea what '.sbat' is and if it can be moved).
The problem is similar for zboot. I have two ideas:
1) Get back to the idea of putting '.sbat' between '.text' and '.data'
(was in my RFC).
2) Introduce a separate '.bss' section to the PE binary, basically:
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/header.S b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
index b5c79f43359b..dae8202705c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/header.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ pecompat_fstart:
IMAGE_SCN_MEM_EXECUTE # Characteristics
.ascii ".data\0\0\0"
- .long ZO__end - ZO__data # VirtualSize
+ .long ZO__edata - ZO__data # VirtualSize
.long setup_size + ZO__data # VirtualAddress
.long ZO__edata - ZO__data # SizeOfRawData
.long setup_size + ZO__data # PointerToRawData
@@ -207,6 +207,17 @@ pecompat_fstart:
IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
IMAGE_SCN_MEM_WRITE # Characteristics
+ .ascii ".bss\0\0\0\0"
+ .long ZO__end - ZO__edata # VirtualSize
+ .long setup_size + ZO__edata # VirtualAddress
+ .long 0 # SizeOfRawData
+ .long 0 # PointerToRawData
+
+ .long 0, 0, 0
+ .long IMAGE_SCN_CNT_UNINITIALIZED_DATA| \
+ IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
+ IMAGE_SCN_MEM_WRITE # Characteristics
+
.set section_count, (. - section_table) / 40
#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_STUB */
This way '.data' doesn't need to be the last meaninful section in
'vmlinux' and we can then pub '.sbat' right after it. I'm going to give
it a try but also I'm wondering why do we have '.data' covering '.bss'
and '.pgtable' in the first place.
--
Vitaly
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 14:09:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a57v9pt4.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXE0WcenLEB+60=+oc+aKfbqZkwYZf-TrOyDY=ShXQ2pYw@mail.gmail.com>
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> writes:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 12:59, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 10:10, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
...
>> >> $(obj)/vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs-y) $(vmlinux-libs-y) FORCE
>> >> $(call if_changed,ld)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> >> index 3b2bc61c9408..d0a27905de90 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> >> @@ -49,9 +49,22 @@ SECTIONS
>> >> *(.data.*)
>> >>
>> >> /* Add 4 bytes of extra space for the obsolete CRC-32 checksum */
>> >> +#ifndef CONFIG_EFI_SBAT
>> >> . = ALIGN(. + 4, 0x200);
>> >> +#else
>> >> + /* Avoid gap between '.data' and '.sbat' */
>> >> + . = ALIGN(. + 4, 0x1000);
>> >> +#endif
>> >> _edata = . ;
>> >> }
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SBAT
>> >> + .sbat : ALIGN(0x1000) {
>> >> + _sbat = . ;
>> >> + *(.sbat)
>> >> + _esbat = ALIGN(0x200);
>> >> + . = _esbat;
>> >> + }
>> >> +#endif
>> >> . = ALIGN(L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>> >> .bss : {
>> >> _bss = . ;
>> >
>> > This looks a bit odd - see below
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/header.S b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
>> >> index b5c79f43359b..ab851490ef74 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/header.S
>> >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
>> >> @@ -207,6 +207,19 @@ pecompat_fstart:
>> >> IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
>> >> IMAGE_SCN_MEM_WRITE # Characteristics
>> >>
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SBAT
>> >> + .ascii ".sbat\0\0\0"
>> >> + .long ZO__esbat - ZO__sbat # VirtualSize
>> >> + .long setup_size + ZO__sbat # VirtualAddress
>> >> + .long ZO__esbat - ZO__sbat # SizeOfRawData
>> >> + .long setup_size + ZO__sbat # PointerToRawData
>> >> +
>> >> + .long 0, 0, 0
>> >> + .long IMAGE_SCN_CNT_INITIALIZED_DATA | \
>> >> + IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
>> >> + IMAGE_SCN_MEM_DISCARDABLE # Characteristics
>> >> +#endif
>> >> +
>> >
>> > This puts the .sbat section at the very end of the file. However, the
>> > virtual size of .data is 'ZO__end - ZO__data' not 'ZO__edata -
>> > ZO__data', and so the .sbat section will overlap with .bss in the
>> > memory view of the image.
>>
>> Missed that, will fix, thanks! A stupid question though: does this
>> matter in practice for SBAT? I don't think anyone needs SBAT data after
>> kernel starts booting so we can consider it 'discarded'. BSS data can
>> then do whatever it wants.
>>
>
> It violates the PE/COFF spec, and some PE loaders and signing tools
> are very pedantic about the layout.
Turns out it the problem is slightly harder to address then I initially
thought. On x86, arch/x86/boot/bzImage is composed of setup.bin and
vmlinux.bin and the later is produced from vmlinux with
objcopy -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux arch/x86/boot/vmlinux.bin
"objcopy -O binary" basically dumps memory representation of vmlinux. In
case we put '.sbat' before '.bss' we get:
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
...
4 .data 00002000 0000000000aef000 0000000000aef000 00af0000 2**12
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
5 .sbat 00001000 0000000000af1000 0000000000af1000 00af2000 2**12
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
6 .bss 00023078 0000000000af2000 0000000000af2000 00af3000 2**12
ALLOC
7 .pgtable 00021000 0000000000b16000 0000000000b16000 00af3000 2**12
ALLOC
...
so we can't have a single '.data' section in PE covering both '.data'
and '.bss'/'.pgtable' as '.sbat' is in the middle and we want it to be a
separate section. If we try putting '.sbat' after '.bss' we are going to
get a hole size of '.bss' + '.pgtable' in arch/x86/boot/vmlinux.bin
because 'objcopy -O binary' is not going to squeeze anything (and it has
no idea what '.sbat' is and if it can be moved).
The problem is similar for zboot. I have two ideas:
1) Get back to the idea of putting '.sbat' between '.text' and '.data'
(was in my RFC).
2) Introduce a separate '.bss' section to the PE binary, basically:
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/header.S b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
index b5c79f43359b..dae8202705c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/header.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ pecompat_fstart:
IMAGE_SCN_MEM_EXECUTE # Characteristics
.ascii ".data\0\0\0"
- .long ZO__end - ZO__data # VirtualSize
+ .long ZO__edata - ZO__data # VirtualSize
.long setup_size + ZO__data # VirtualAddress
.long ZO__edata - ZO__data # SizeOfRawData
.long setup_size + ZO__data # PointerToRawData
@@ -207,6 +207,17 @@ pecompat_fstart:
IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
IMAGE_SCN_MEM_WRITE # Characteristics
+ .ascii ".bss\0\0\0\0"
+ .long ZO__end - ZO__edata # VirtualSize
+ .long setup_size + ZO__edata # VirtualAddress
+ .long 0 # SizeOfRawData
+ .long 0 # PointerToRawData
+
+ .long 0, 0, 0
+ .long IMAGE_SCN_CNT_UNINITIALIZED_DATA| \
+ IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ | \
+ IMAGE_SCN_MEM_WRITE # Characteristics
+
.set section_count, (. - section_table) / 40
#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_STUB */
This way '.data' doesn't need to be the last meaninful section in
'vmlinux' and we can then pub '.sbat' right after it. I'm going to give
it a try but also I'm wondering why do we have '.data' covering '.bss'
and '.pgtable' in the first place.
--
Vitaly
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 8:09 [PATCH 0/2] efi: Add a mechanism for embedding SBAT section Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-24 8:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-24 8:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] efi/libstub: zboot specific " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-24 8:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-24 16:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 16:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-28 10:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-28 10:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-28 14:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-28 14:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 8:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-24 8:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-25 6:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-25 6:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-28 10:59 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-28 10:59 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-28 15:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-28 15:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-02 12:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2025-05-02 12:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-05-02 13:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-02 13:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-02 13:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-05-02 13:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-05-02 13:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-02 13:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-29 9:55 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-29 9:55 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-29 10:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-29 10:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-29 10:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2025-04-29 10:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a57v9pt4.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.