From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26762C021B2 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tmuE9-0002RS-Ap; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:39:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tmuE7-0002R5-Q8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:39:55 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tmuE5-0002wH-OR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:39:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1740487192; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eiWG8k66jufvssvpkAxop/5vzlP5F8cbUI/xmzpohsM=; b=C7q69xyCcDoDyJ2YBrayX9Cd6iLYVLIc0AjyqGLc1T0xDdrnpPZ28Y33ylAdvxa4Hr/P2C b6+YiBRNfiEVnimRyuXPor5aHpPeKuFIm/5HkkgT2TzlK25wzJJ+3I2hiPsZ7HfW5H8Jfz vnAcXU44WeDZtCNZRwEWu3P8eusly0Q= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-401-_VYt6VzNNyikfay5QUPC2Q-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:39:50 -0500 X-MC-Unique: _VYt6VzNNyikfay5QUPC2Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: _VYt6VzNNyikfay5QUPC2Q_1740487190 Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A9919560B9; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.45.242.9]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC45819560AE; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5347B21E675E; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:39:47 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Cleber Rosa , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] python: integrate linter tests natively with meson In-Reply-To: ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:07:47 +0000") References: <20250224191152.2123003-1-berrange@redhat.com> <87y0xud0h0.fsf@pond.sub.org> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:39:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87a5aa9p0s.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.443, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 07:04:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> John, how does this mix with the linting parts of your "[PATCH 00/10] >> qapi: misc testing and doc patches"? > > Since this is only an RFC, I would expect that John's patch series can > simply ignore this & merge when ready. If we decide to turn this into > a non-RFC series, than we can figure out the resolution at that point. > At a quick glance, I don't see anything John's done in his series that > would complicate life for this proposal in any notable way. Okay. Different question for John: do you think this RFC moves us in a forward direction?