From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0592215A4B0 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727370825; cv=none; b=BKHAWcIUGeiXEPVzTZRimrrpBACgrVVITzi2tgdikKGb6TNyGJGCzgcQj1KGtAJixeQU0CD6bono7b4eVFVlFR7eg2xQsb6VaoqkxCVpakffrCeE33eUYr/KrbBUcKHn1WFDfxFSJ8tV4PWLv4IbsCn6ZoAaYHlYWCSRehrabWY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727370825; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mWNKsYIWpxaogtNqsS6JvImdU0j79sOUoS0VnwfK5bI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DW2iZ609kaJdvxtl3GLRCB27lCVMckPKLViwn+5WUc748lFvBokzjZugVoBschnGrL1qxnE0pJfhoNfFoyE/KoQr4J54d/JprH8Zu13stZe/n8gq9gUo4/6UwUO6liSeFDDBG/FKKnHISLCGfsPuYbE2WXlftUJKaAvZqKGKqHg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=suq9Iu35; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=VkbNo08y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="suq9Iu35"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="VkbNo08y" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1727370822; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SmXKcRBnQIK8BbboNjLvPeXPPG+aoXFwXL972NcWxQY=; b=suq9Iu35jOkDGTU8Qk3ZlFY2a4SLYGgmcE6My6Pc0KyHAFjF9jWvYxFNJQE/hfecvLfLCy m+sXsOP2bsAwNmPY7wPRPwBPP8X2B3uwsBJX1h0Ji8goApIXYIfkBoosP7BJGZAWvx3Jco eaUrlQ31l/QS6//ljzoKv/MaBKHSctJyHQu98/VqPXZxs44sRRpUieeYdeQlmG5a9qyf+G oOUjPyDn14ONf+1NEkw9I6Nb/Jo2Z63yAMHLKVf6sHriC1Qld+zh67YSYkqV0ypZMckZTT W0pcp9QLMAr1pPDCQ1W4HDGv5ShuxcKRiNVZ1DvuV27EcaBrn7vbCRL8Q062fw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1727370822; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SmXKcRBnQIK8BbboNjLvPeXPPG+aoXFwXL972NcWxQY=; b=VkbNo08ybE5luEGF7DH50WUm4nbzWd+YiBLc8X2CYfsuUdcxuibBJvFuM1MzCT7kLeykbL UZQu1nSL1bLEbsBA== To: NeilBrown , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 v3] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile In-Reply-To: <20240925053405.3960701-1-neilb@suse.de> References: <20240925053405.3960701-1-neilb@suse.de> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:13:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5fu2v96.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Sep 25 2024 at 15:31, NeilBrown wrote: > this is a revised set of patches for cleaning up wake_up_bit and > wake_up_var and related. They are the result of more proof reading, > and of trying to make use of the new interfaces anywhere in the kernel > where these interfaces are used. Now I have two variants of a v3 patch set in my inbox. One with 7 and one with 8 patches. Both sent within a couple of minutes.... Confused. Thanks, tglx