From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in static_call_del_module()
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 10:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5gn7sqz.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cylj7v6x.ffs@tglx>
On Wed, Sep 04 2024 at 09:08, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04 2024 at 11:32, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> So the check must be:
>
> if (!static_call_key_has_mods(key))
> break;
>
> I missed the module local case completely in my analysis. Can you please
> modify the condition and retest?
That said. This code is pointlessly noisy for the failure case.
Allocation fails are not a reason to warn about. -ENOMEM is propagated
all the way to the caller, so it's sufficient to emit a pr_warn().
Peter?
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/static_call_inline.c
+++ b/kernel/static_call_inline.c
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int static_call_module_notify(str
case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
ret = static_call_add_module(mod);
if (ret) {
- WARN(1, "Failed to allocate memory for static calls");
+ pr_warn("Failed to allocate memory for static calls\n");
static_call_del_module(mod);
}
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 8:21 [PATCH] static_call: Fix a wild-memory-access bug in static_call_del_module() Jinjie Ruan
2023-09-15 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-02 12:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-02 12:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:07 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-02 12:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-03 20:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-03 22:58 ` [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly " Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 3:32 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-04 7:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 8:00 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-09-04 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-04 9:08 ` [PATCH] static_call: Replace pointless WARN_ON() in static_call_module_notify() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-06 14:41 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 8:03 ` [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in static_call_del_module() Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-04 8:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 9:50 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-05 3:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-05 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-06 23:24 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-09-19 9:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-09-24 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-08 8:12 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-11-08 15:49 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-11-08 16:09 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-11-08 16:22 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-09-04 9:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 9:19 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 14:41 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5gn7sqz.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.