From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/idle: Prevent stopping the tick when there is no cpuidle driver
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 11:56:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5pag6q7.fsf@somnus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06a2561f-557b-4eaa-8f11-75883bbbaef9@arm.com>
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> writes:
> Hello Anna-Maria,
>
> On 1/9/24 17:24, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
>>
>> When there is no cpuidle driver, there is no instance which could bring
>> the CPU into a deeper C state. But at the moment the code does
>> unconditionally try to stop the tick. So the aim of the patch is to
>> remove this unconditional stop of the tick.
>
> I agree that the absence of cpuidle driver prevents from reaching deep
> idle states. FWIU, there is however still benefits in stopping the tick
> on such platform.
What's the benefit?
Thanks,
Anna-Maria
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-12 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-15 13:05 [PATCH] sched/idle: Prevent stopping the tick when there is no cpuidle driver Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-12-21 15:22 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-01-09 16:24 ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2024-01-10 10:20 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-01-12 10:56 ` Anna-Maria Behnsen [this message]
2024-01-12 13:39 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-01-12 14:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-15 12:40 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-01-15 13:10 ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2024-01-15 13:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-01-15 15:41 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-01-22 10:22 ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5pag6q7.fsf@somnus \
--to=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.