From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 404166EB60 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 14:44:39 -0700 Message-ID: <87a6lvtvlk.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" In-Reply-To: <20210726200026.4815-18-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> References: <20210726200026.4815-1-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> <20210726200026.4815-18-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 17/52] tests/gem_eio: Adopt to use allocator List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: Zbigniew =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Kempczy=F1ski?= Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Petri Latvala List-ID: On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:59:51 -0700, Zbigniew Kempczy=F1ski wrote: > > -static void reset_stress(int fd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx0, > +static void reset_stress(int fd, uint64_t ahnd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx0, I think it would have been ok to allocate ahnd inside reset_stress() but looks like we wanted to keep it tied to ctx_create/destroy, so this is: Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit