All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 11/12] softirq: Allow inlining do_softirq_own_stack()
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 12:38:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6siagna.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJhGHyDF-wuK0Q0RZ9mDTo19rayA-jjJ1SGp2-1TS_d5-eHDzw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 05 2021 at 18:14, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 10:04 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>  static inline void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
>>  {
>
> Hello
>
> This patch and the next patch have three "#if[n]def" with
> __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ_INLINE and this one is nested in
> __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ.
>
> I wonder if we can use __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ only.
>
> For example, we can move "void do_softirq_own_stack(void);" to around
> the code where __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ are defined in very ARCHs.
> (And for x86, do_softirq_own_stack() is a macro instead of function
> declaration as next patch shows)

We can do that as well. No strong preference.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-04 20:49 [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 01/12] x86/entry: Fix instrumentation annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 12:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 02/12] x86/irq: Sanitize irq stack tracking Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 03/12] x86/irq/64: Adjust the per CPU irq stack pointer by 8 Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 13:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-05 15:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 04/12] x86/apic: Split out spurious handling code Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 05/12] x86/irq: Provide macro for inlining irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 15:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 20:42   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 15:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 16:22       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 18:14         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05  3:52   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05  3:52     ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05 14:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-05 14:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-07  8:15       ` Rong Chen
2021-02-07  8:15         ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-02-08 14:19         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 14:19           ` [kbuild-all] " Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09  8:57           ` Rong Chen
2021-02-09  8:57             ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-02-09 10:46             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09 10:46               ` [kbuild-all] " Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 07/12] x86/entry: Convert device interrupts to inline stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 08/12] x86/entry: Use run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond() for XEN upcall Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05  7:28   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05  7:28     ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 09/12] x86/softirq: Remove indirection in do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 10/12] x86: Select CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 11/12] softirq: Allow inlining do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 10:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-02-05 11:38     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-02-09 20:43       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 12/12] x86/softirq/64: Inline do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 21:47 ` [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a6siagna.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.