From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt.kanzenbach@linutronix.de>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
olteanv@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: sja1105: Fix return value check in sja1105_ptp_clock_register()
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:10:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6vlspe5.fsf@kurt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112145532.38320-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1576 bytes --]
On Thu Nov 12 2020, YueHaibing wrote:
> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c:869 sja1105_ptp_clock_register() warn: passing zero to 'PTR_ERR'
>
> ptp_clock_register() returns ERR_PTR() and never returns
> NULL. The NULL test should be removed.
Which is not true. From the documentation:
* Returns a valid pointer on success or PTR_ERR on failure. If PHC
* support is missing at the configuration level, this function
* returns NULL, and drivers are expected to gracefully handle that
* case separately.
Please, always Cc Richard for PTP patches.
Actually you can have a look at this discussion here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/netdev/1605086686-5140-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com/
>
> Fixes: bb77f36ac21d ("net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for the PTP clock")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c
> index 1b90570b257b..1e41d491c854 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c
> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ int sja1105_ptp_clock_register(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> spin_lock_init(&tagger_data->meta_lock);
>
> ptp_data->clock = ptp_clock_register(&ptp_data->caps, ds->dev);
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptp_data->clock))
> + if (IS_ERR(ptp_data->clock))
When you do this, you'll have to make sure that the driver handles the
NULL case "gracefully".
Thanks,
Kurt
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 14:55 [PATCH] net: dsa: sja1105: Fix return value check in sja1105_ptp_clock_register() YueHaibing
2020-11-13 7:10 ` Kurt Kanzenbach [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6vlspe5.fsf@kurt \
--to=kurt.kanzenbach@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.